Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:29:40PM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Ok, Port 53 is not in use in the jail nor the hostsystem. I think the problem is 0.0.0.0, and i have to bind named on the IP of the jail. I tested same named configuration on the hostsystem, i thought about some

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:17:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: What is really strange is that tun is compiled in the kernel, but the module is started anyway ??? $ kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 16 0xc040 35aef8 kernel 21 0xc075b000 4cd10acpi.ko 31

Re: TEST PLEASE: if_tun patch

2003-10-03 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:17:05PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: It looks strange to have `ifconfig create' vlan interface on tap, while tap uses different semantics and can disappear after closing it? With ef it is even worse, pseudo-devices are created while ef is starting, so ef module

Re: TEST PLEASE: if_tun patch

2003-09-30 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:04:42PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: I'm not convinced this is the right direction to move in. The problem is that users are beginning to expect that pseudo-interfaces be created with network interface cloning, but tun, tap, and vmnet aren't. I'm Same about ef(4)