Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Steven Hartland
Yes it does know how to figure out based on stripe size On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 20:25, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Dec 2017 09:31:53 -0800 (PST) > "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb: > > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:04 AM, O. Hartmann

Re: ZFS: alignment/boundary for partition type freebsd-zfs

2017-12-26 Thread Steven Hartland
You only need to set the min if the drives hide their true sector size, as Allan mentioned. camcontrol identify is one of the easiest ways to check this. If the pool reports ashift 12 then zfs correctly detected the drives as 4K so that part is good On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 20:15, Rodney W.

Re: r319971 -> r320351: Fatal error 'Cannot allocate red zone for initial thread'

2017-06-26 Thread Steven Hartland
Is this related to kib's additional fix over the weekend? https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/320344 Regards Steve On 26/06/2017 09:29, O. Hartmann wrote: Over the past week we did not update several 12-CURRENT running development hosts, so today is the first day of performing

Re: Are textmode consoles/terminals still supported?

2017-03-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Add the following to /boot/loader.conf Its a tunable but not a sysctl so you can't query it, you just need to set it by adding it to /boot/loader.conf: hw.vga.textmode="1" On 20/03/2017 21:58, Chris H wrote: I'm attempting to get a video card that DTRT on FreeBSD. I started with the graphics

Re: gptzfsboot trouble

2017-02-07 Thread Steven Hartland
On 07/02/2017 16:33, Toomas Soome wrote: On 7. veebr 2017, at 18:08, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: Hi all Last week I decided to upgrade my FreeBSD installation - it's been a while (September 16 was last time). Unfortunately CURRENT does not boot and cash in

Re: recent change to vim defaults?

2017-01-15 Thread Steven Hartland
On 15/01/2017 17:45, Pete Wright wrote: On 1/15/17 8:22 AM, Kyle Evans wrote: On Jan 15, 2017 10:03, "Julian Elischer" wrote: I noticed that suddenly vim is grabbing mouse movements, which makes life really hard. Was there a specific revision that brought in this

Re: HEADS-UP: IFLIB implementations of sys/dev/e1000 em, lem, igb pending

2017-01-06 Thread Steven Hartland
Hmm I'm not sure about everyone else but I we treat emX as legacy devices (not used one in years) but igbX is very common here. The impact of changing a nic device name is quite a bit more involved than just rc.conf it effects other areas too, jails etc so given we can loose access to the

Re: Destroy GPT partition scheme absolutely, how?

2016-10-04 Thread Steven Hartland
CAM already does this, doesn't really help with speed as much as you might think though. On 04/10/2016 19:53, Maxim Sobolev wrote: For the whole disk destruction, hopefully one day we'd have BIO_DELETE coalesce code, so that you can batch of lot of operations into handful SATA commands. I've

Re: commits between r305191 - r305211 broke zfs list

2016-09-03 Thread Steven Hartland
Out of sync kernel / world? Do you have a crash dump? On 03/09/2016 21:50, Subbsd wrote: Hi. Can anybody test of output for: zfs list command on FreeBSD current after r305211 ? On my hosts his leads to zfs segfault. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: 11.0-BETA1 make installworldworld fails

2016-07-18 Thread Steven Hartland
When ever I've seen installworld issues after a full buildworld its been clock related, so might want to check the clock on the machine is right. On 17/07/2016 20:58, Kim Culhan wrote: Seeing this on FreeBSD 11.0-BETA1 #0 r302963M After make buildworld completes with no problem, then rebooted

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-12 Thread Steven Hartland
On 12/07/2016 22:20, Ed Schouten wrote: 2016-07-11 23:01 GMT+02:00 Ronald Klop : Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r. I remember back in the days we also had a

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-12 Thread Steven Hartland
On 12/07/2016 21:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:39:34PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: Maybe Tier 2 can deal with just bootonly.iso. Or your machines should be dropped from Tier 2 if they don't support USB and we aren't okay with dropping disc1 support for all of Tier 2.

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-12 Thread Steven Hartland
On 12/07/2016 20:52, Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:09:10PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: +1 on dropping CD images. I have 24U of things that don't have DVD players, including some tier-2 machines for which no upgrade is available. Any no USB?

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-BETA1-amd64-disc1.iso is too big for my 700MB CD-r

2016-07-11 Thread Steven Hartland
On 11/07/2016 23:39, Allan Jude wrote: On 2016-07-11 18:33, Chris H wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:46:04 +0300 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:41:44PM +, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: On Mon, Jul

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-08 Thread Steven Hartland
hanks again. On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk <mailto:kill...@multiplay.co.uk>> wrote: On 06/07/2016 21:39, Eric van Gyzen wrote: On 07/06/16 03:35 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: The ARC settings and kmem

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-06 Thread Steven Hartland
On 06/07/2016 21:39, Eric van Gyzen wrote: On 07/06/16 03:35 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: The ARC settings and kmem aren't initialised when tunables are loaded so the tests fail. I've fixed this locally by blindly setting if ARC is not configured. Request to commit the fix is with re

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-06 Thread Steven Hartland
d notice that using 'sysct' or sysctl.conf for vfs.zfs.arc_max >> and vfs.zfs.arc_min works. >> I only have problems with setting them now in loader.conf. >> >> Like I said, I'll try to send output from my setup later. >>

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-06 Thread Steven Hartland
On 06/07/2016 02:25, Allan Jude wrote: On 2016-07-05 20:27, Steven Hartland wrote: Ahh right, let me check that. On 06/07/2016 00:51, Nathan Bosley wrote: I actually have this same problem. I'll send more details when I get home later. I think the problem started for me after r302265. Before

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-05 Thread Steven Hartland
' or sysctl.conf for vfs.zfs.arc_max and vfs.zfs.arc_min works. I only have problems with setting them now in loader.conf. Like I said, I'll try to send output from my setup later. Thanks. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Steven Hartland <ste...@multiplay.co.uk <mailto:ste...@multiplay.co.uk&g

Re: Setting sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max failed: 22

2016-07-05 Thread Steven Hartland
What is it currently? Just had a quick play here: sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127808 sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max=32283127807 vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127808 -> 32283127807 sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_max=32283127808 vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32283127807 -> 32283127808 Error 22 = EINVAL so I suspect

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Steven Hartland
On 24/05/2016 21:56, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a

Re: Samsung SSD TRIM [Was: Heads up]

2016-04-15 Thread Steven Hartland
On 15/04/2016 09:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! avg wrote: For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of 2015 : ada2: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device ada3: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device I have one in use with zfs and trim: ada1: ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device Works as my

Re: Question about cam 4K quirks

2016-04-11 Thread Steven Hartland
On 11/04/2016 15:24, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: Thanks for your answer! On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:15:56 +0100 Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: On 10/04/2016 15:35, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:04 -0600 Alan Somers <asom...@freebsd.org> wrote: On Sun,

Re: Question about cam 4K quirks

2016-04-10 Thread Steven Hartland
On 10/04/2016 15:35, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 06:59:04 -0600 Alan Somers wrote: On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: Hi. Maybe freebsd-hardware list would be the right place, but it's not so active. :-( Is

Re: Mixed ashift?

2016-03-31 Thread Steven Hartland
vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift is only used when a device is added so you can set it add, then change. On 31/03/2016 07:15, Allan Jude wrote: On 2016-03-31 02:13, Dustin Marquess wrote: I have what I think is a pretty normal setup.. a bunch of HDDs plus 2 SSDs (one ZIL, one SLOG). The HDDs are

Re: boot loaders got fatter in the last few days

2016-03-19 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/03/2016 17:51, Guido Falsi wrote: On 03/18/16 17:54, José Pérez wrote: Hi Guido, maybe it's because of this: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision=296963 I see. There is a problem with this though, we have howtos suggesting 64K for the size of the freebsd-boot gpt partition:

Re: boot loaders got fatter in the last few days

2016-03-19 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/03/2016 17:42, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: On 03/18/16 13:03, Allan Jude wrote: On 2016-03-18 12:33, Guido Falsi wrote: Hi, I have just update one of my machines and noticed the booloaders files got quite fat in the last few days, some by a big margin. on an updated machine(r296993): ls

Re: Crashes in libthr?

2016-03-14 Thread Steven Hartland
On 14/03/2016 22:28, Larry Rosenman wrote: On 2016-03-14 17:25, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <2016031428.ga1...@borg.lerctr.org>, Larry Rosenman writes: And sshd is busted. FYI: I seeing no such issues on two systems running: 11.0-CURRENT #4 r296808: Sun Mar 13

Re: loader and load: path?

2016-03-07 Thread Steven Hartland
So your saying "kldload zfs" fails because it can't find opensolaris or are you giving it absolute paths? If so try without absolute paths. Regards Steve On 07/03/2016 14:09, Larry Rosenman wrote: If I type load /boot/kernel/kernel, and then load /boot/kernel/zfs.ko, the loader

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

2016-02-22 Thread Steven Hartland
isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU? On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote: This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2 Ultima On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote: Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have? Jeff

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-02-05 Thread Steven Hartland
Yep thanks, I committed this to head today, after Warner confirmed it was good in his env too. It will sit there for 1 week before I request permission to MFC to stable/10. On 05/02/2016 17:24, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > I got a feedback from Yuichiro NAITO at freebsd-users-jp ML. > > Boots fine

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-02-01 Thread Steven Hartland
r Diff8 are done. Regards. On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:58:23 + Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: Thanks for doing that it was very helpful, and I know transcribing from video would have been quite a time consuming task. I noticed a few interesting facts: 1. It looks l

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-02-01 Thread Steven Hartland
dition to test 2) and 3), 5) [USB boot] for Diff7 and 1) [single drive] for Diff8 are done. Regards. On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:58:23 + Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: Thanks for doing that it was very helpful, and I know transcribing from video would have been quite a ti

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-31 Thread Steven Hartland
currently Diff6 doesn't apply to stable/10. Regards. On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:12:34 +0000 Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: I believe, based on testing, that the from Diff 5 onwards of https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5108 this should work as you expect it i.e. If boot1 is load

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-30 Thread Steven Hartland
o I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in boot1.c. I'd have been missing something. Regards. On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:58:26 +0000 Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote: On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI <junch...

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-30 Thread Steven Hartland
o I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in boot1.c. I'd have been missing something. Regards. On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:58:26 +0000 Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote: On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI <junch...

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-30 Thread Steven Hartland
, ...) helps, too. I built ZFS-disabled boot1.efi > and it worked fine for USB memstick for me. > > *`make clean && make -DMK_ZFS=no` in sys/boot/efi/boot1 didn't disabled >ZFS module, so I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in >boot1.c. I'd have been missi

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-30 Thread Steven Hartland
I just realised an important point, does your usb disk have a UFS root partition and your internal disk ZFS root partition? If so then I know what the issue is, I'll have quick look now, so wait for a diff5 to appear before testing. On Saturday, 30 January 2016, Steven Hartland <

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-28 Thread Steven Hartland
On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote: On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: It's exactly the NO GOOD point. The disk where boot1 is read from should be where loader.efi and loader.conf are first read. I just wanted to note that gptzfsboot and zfsboot

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2016-01-24 Thread Steven Hartland
On 24/01/2016 12:53, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: Unfortunately, this (and its committed successor and original for UFS) fails to boot in some situation, like below. OTOH, gptzfsboot (and maybe gptboot for UFS, too) is OK. When I select Disk1 from UEFI firmware, bootx64.efi in Disk1 EFI partition is

Re: r294248: boot stuck: EFI loader doesn't proceed

2016-01-18 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/01/2016 21:57, Ed Maste wrote: On 18 January 2016 at 15:26, Andrew Turner wrote: the issue was we were caching reads from the first filesystem we looked at. I've committed the fix in r294291 to force the code to re-read on each filesystem it looks at. Thanks Andrew

Re: r294248: boot stuck: EFI loader doesn't proceed

2016-01-18 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/01/2016 19:08, Ed Maste wrote: On 18 January 2016 at 03:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 18 Jan 2016, at 07:20, O. Hartmann wrote: Building NanoBSD images booting off from USB Flash drives and having two GPT partitions, booting is stuck in

Re: FreeBsd MCA Panic Crash !!

2016-01-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Bank 5 seems to be common to all the crashes, which may suggest you have some dodgy ram or possibly the driving CPU's memory controller. As the error says this is a Hardware issue. One thing we've used in the past to narrow issues like this down is to remove as much RAM as possible and to

Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

2015-12-10 Thread Steven Hartland
Ive literally just got this working on 10.2 after working on the code posted on the review which you can find here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4104 If you're happy running current then the patch file I linked in my comment should apply cleanly and just work. If you want 10.x then there's quite

Re: Increase BUFSIZ to 8192

2015-05-12 Thread Steven Hartland
4k block size on the underlying device? On 12/05/2015 00:14, Adrian Chadd wrote: So I'm curious - why's it faster? -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Re: Fix for r281680 -- broke i386 world

2015-04-18 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/04/2015 17:30, David Wolfskill wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 06:34:59PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: ... - printf(LE_STATUS: %d %d %lx\n, e, rp.status, rp.le_status); + printf(LE_STATUS: %d %d %jx\n, e, rp.status, rp.le_status); return 0; } The j modificator

Re: T40 bootloop on CAM status: Command timeout on both 10.1 and -CURRENT

2015-03-31 Thread Steven Hartland
Verbose boot of the working OS version was what I was after, which should provide details of what its detecting ;-) Also a camcontrol identify of the cdrom from the working version may also be useful On 31/03/2015 09:54, Pietro Sammarco wrote: Currently the cdrom drive and yes it works fine

Re: T40 bootloop on CAM status: Command timeout on both 10.1 and -CURRENT

2015-03-30 Thread Steven Hartland
Is there anything connected to the second channel, if so what. Was this working in a previous version and if so which one and what was the verbose boot log from it? On 30/03/2015 19:07, bsdml wrote: Hello Kevin, thanks for your clarification. Unfortunately I wasn't aware that the T40 and

Re: who broke dtrace and buildworld?

2015-01-17 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/01/2015 00:22, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:54:47PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: % cd /usr/src % svn update Updating '.': At revision 277307. % make buildworld === cddl/usr.sbin/dtrace (all) cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2

Re: who broke dtrace and buildworld?

2015-01-17 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/01/2015 02:35, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 02:10:19AM +, Steven Hartland wrote: On 18/01/2015 01:44, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:09AM +, Steven Hartland wrote: % svn revert -r 377300:377299 . Just double checked and I can building r277307

Re: who broke dtrace and buildworld?

2015-01-17 Thread Steven Hartland
On 18/01/2015 01:44, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:09AM +, Steven Hartland wrote: % svn revert -r 377300:377299 . Just double checked and I can building r277307 without issue, build box is running 10.1-RELEASE. My head box is quite a bit slower and is still running

Re: asr(4) error with new clang/llvm

2015-01-01 Thread Steven Hartland
On 02/01/2015 01:23, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, you need the next line of source to see that while the union only defines Simple[1], the comparison goes up to SG_LIST (or something) which is indeed defined as 58. Cn someone fix this? This makes i386 compiles failing currently.

Re: Fix Emulex oce driver in CURRENT

2014-12-05 Thread Steven Hartland
On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to review this. Hi, Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline

Re: Fix Emulex oce driver in CURRENT

2014-12-05 Thread Steven Hartland
On 05/12/2014 13:07, Borja Marcos wrote: On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked with folks at Emulex to maintain

Re: Problem with r274819? asr_timeout() not found

2014-11-22 Thread Steven Hartland
Fixed, sorry forgot asr wasn't in GENERIC, so missed it in testing. On 22/11/2014 14:34, David Wolfskill wrote: Running: FreeBSD g1-253.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1434 r274790M/274790:1100047: Fri Nov 21 06:07:24 PST 2014

Re: init(8) diagnostics?

2014-11-16 Thread Steven Hartland
Its usually something like stalled IO On 16/11/2014 18:07, Steve Kargl wrote: In init(8), one finds under DIAGNOSISTICS some processes would not die; ps axl advised. So, just how is one to actually run 'ps axl advised' as the message appears as init(8) is killing off the system?

Re: r273165. ZFS ARC: possible memory leak to Inact

2014-11-05 Thread Steven Hartland
On 05/11/2014 06:15, Marcus Reid wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:13:44PM +, Steven Hartland wrote: On 04/11/2014 17:22, Allan Jude wrote: snip... Justin Gibbs and I were helping George from Voxer look at the same issue they are having. They had ~169GB in inact, and only ~60GB being used

Re: r273165. ZFS ARC: possible memory leak to Inact

2014-11-05 Thread Steven Hartland
On 05/11/2014 09:52, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 04/11/2014 14:55, Steven Hartland wrote: This is likely spikes in uma zones used by ARC. The VM doesn't ever clean uma zones unless it hits a low memory condition, which explains why your little script helps. Check the output of vmstat -z

Re: r273165. ZFS ARC: possible memory leak to Inact

2014-11-04 Thread Steven Hartland
This is likely spikes in uma zones used by ARC. The VM doesn't ever clean uma zones unless it hits a low memory condition, which explains why your little script helps. Check the output of vmstat -z to confirm. On 04/11/2014 11:47, Dmitriy Makarov wrote: Hi Current, It seems like there is

Re: r273165. ZFS ARC: possible memory leak to Inact

2014-11-04 Thread Steven Hartland
On 04/11/2014 17:22, Allan Jude wrote: snip... Justin Gibbs and I were helping George from Voxer look at the same issue they are having. They had ~169GB in inact, and only ~60GB being used for ARC. Are there any further debugging steps we can recommend to him to help investigate this? The

Re: r273165. ZFS ARC: possible memory leak to Inact

2014-11-04 Thread Steven Hartland
On 04/11/2014 17:57, Ben Perrault wrote: snip... I would also be interested in any additional debugging steps and would be willing to help test in any way I can - as I've seen the behavior a few times as well. As recently a Sunday evening, I caught a system running with ~44GB ARC but ~117GB

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the root partition really doesn't sound like a good idea; especially when with the ZFS install, which I would

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 09:47, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:47 , O'Connor, Daniel Daniel.O'con...@emc.com wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 14:15, Ed Maste wrote: On 30 October 2014 09:21, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: (a) symbol files are for developers. Developers are clever people, often with custom systems, they know how to deal with them

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-30 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 14:40, Ed Maste wrote: On 30 October 2014 10:26, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: Yer that's the process that was in my head, if debug symbols aren't available when savecore runs we're going to need a way to update / rerun when they are available, or even better

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Hartland
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a copy / backup a kernel. ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one liner, splitting debug symbols off to /usr/lib would prevent this. Is there not a way to allow separate install of the debug files but

Re: HEADS UP: Standalone kernel debug files moving out of /boot/kernel/

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Hartland
On 30/10/2014 02:32, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a copy / backup a kernel. ATM when I want

Re: OOM killer and kernel cache reclamation rate limit in vm_pageout_scan()

2014-10-16 Thread Steven Hartland
Unfortunately ZFS doesn't prevent new inflight writes until it hits zfs_dirty_data_max, so while what your suggesting will help, if the writes come in quick enough I would expect it to still be able to out run the pageout. - Original Message - From: Justin T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org

Re: zfs hang

2014-10-09 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org To: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org Cc: curr...@freebsd.org; f...@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:27 AM Subject: Re: zfs hang On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:55:26AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 08/10/2014 03:40,

Re: Looping during boot-up process in FreeBSD-11 current

2014-09-28 Thread Steven Hartland
The only recent ATAPI change I recall is 270327, does it still occur if you revert that? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com I'm starting to look at FreeBSD 11-current to see what's coming soon. I have an older notebook that I use for test

Re: Looping during boot-up process in FreeBSD-11 current

2014-09-28 Thread Steven Hartland
during boot-up process in FreeBSD-11 current On 9/28/2014 at 5:01 PM Steven Hartland wrote: |The only recent ATAPI change I recall is 270327, does it still occur |if you revert that? | = OK, I'll download the 11-current source. Then revert 270327 https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base

Re: What do you use for kernel debugging?

2014-09-28 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu To: José Pérez Arauzo f...@aoek.com Cc: FreeBSD Current freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 8:54 PM Subject: Re: What do you use for kernel debugging? On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, José Pérez Arauzo wrote:

Re: zpool frag

2014-09-21 Thread Steven Hartland
Backup the pool and restore it is the only way I'm aware of. - Original Message - From: Beeblebrox zap...@berentweb.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 9:57 AM Subject: zpool frag FRAG means fragmentation, right? Zpool fragmentation? That's news to

Re: zpool frag

2014-09-21 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org On Sunday, September 21, 2014 11:06:10 AM Allan Jude wrote: On 2014-09-21 04:57, Beeblebrox wrote: FRAG means fragmentation, right? Zpool fragmentation? That's news to me. If this is real how do I fix it? NAME SIZE

Re: zpool: multiple IDs, CURRENT drops all pools after reboot

2014-09-16 Thread Steven Hartland
On of my backup drives dedicated to a ZPOOL is faulting and showing up multiple ID. The only working ID is id: 257822624560506537. FreeBSD CURRENT with three ZFS disks and only 4GB of RAM is very flaky regarding this issue: today, tow times the whole poolset vanishes after a reboot. Giving the

Re: ZFS-related panic: possible spa-spa_errlog_lock deadlock

2014-09-07 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Xin Li delp...@delphij.net To: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Motin m...@ixsystems.com Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 4:56 PM Subject: Re: ZFS-related panic: possible spa-spa_errlog_lock deadlock

Re: i386 compilation errors in head/sys/dev/ixl/if_ixl.c

2014-08-29 Thread Steven Hartland
Looks like this was already fixed by: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270799 Regards Steve - Original Message - From: David Shao davs...@gmail.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 6:38 AM Subject: i386 compilation errors in

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: FreeBSD_HEAD #1334

2014-08-28 Thread Steven Hartland
This should already be fixed by r270758 - Original Message - From: jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org To: jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; rodr...@freebsd.org; j...@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:53 PM Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: FreeBSD_HEAD #1334

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Can you provide the details of the zio which caused the panic? Also does any of your pools support trim? Regards Steve - Original Message - From: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org To: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 3:03 PM Subject:

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548 On 2014-07-20 14:18, Steven Hartland wrote: Can you provide the details of the zio which caused the panic? Also does

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
Can you try reverting r265321 and see if you still see the same crash? Regards Steve ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:22 AM Subject: Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548 On 2014-07-20 18:21, Steven Hartland

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com I think I may have hit the same problem; I'm going to stay connected to the console and see if it happens again; this is what I see currently with the back-trace: db bt Tracing pid 0 tid 100070 td 0xf8000e088920

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:29 AM Subject: Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

2014-07-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Dan Mack m...@macktronics.com To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 2:29 AM Subject: Re: [ZFS][PANIC] Solaris Assert/zio.c:2548

Re: ZFS ARC max sort of not working?

2014-07-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Related to the global sysctl changes recently perhaps? - Original Message - From: Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me To: freebsd-current freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 4:56 PM Subject: ZFS ARC max sort of not working? It looks like the following no longer

Re: 11.0-CURRENT #1 r267422: OpenLDAP fails to startup out of the blue after buildworld

2014-06-12 Thread Steven Hartland
I've nevery used this but Error 13 is permission denied in errno.h so I've guessing something has messed with some permissions possibly a file permission there somewhere? If its not obvious, the you could try run it under truss to see what is returning error 13. Regards Steve -

Re: CURRENT: why is CURRENT swapping so fast?

2014-06-11 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de Am 12.06.2014 00:36, schrieb O. Hartmann: I use my boxes for daily work and in most cases, the usage of applications is the same. Compiling the OS and updating ports while having claws-mail and firefox opened is

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-04 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de Thanks for your help testing this Fabian, I've now committed the fix for this for this: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/265321 Regards Steve ___

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216), I got the following fatal double fault on boot: http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/ My previous kernel was based on r264721. I'm

Re: Fatal double fault in ZFS with yesterday's CURRENT

2014-05-03 Thread Steven Hartland
Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: From: Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de After updating my laptop to yesterday's CURRENT (r265216), I got the following fatal double fault on boot: http://www.fabiankeil.de/bilder/freebsd/kernel-panic-r265216/ My previous kernel

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2014-04-24 Thread Steven Hartland
Fixed by r264883 sorry for the breakage. - Original Message - From: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org To: FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org; curr...@freebsd.org; i...@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:48 PM Subject: [head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 TB

Re: ZFS secondarycache on SSD problem on r255173

2014-03-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org on 18/10/2013 17:57 Steven Hartland said the following: I think we we may well need the following patch to set the minblock size based on the vdev ashift and not SPA_MINBLOCKSIZE. svn diff -x -p sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-04 Thread Steven Hartland
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:04:00 - Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: .. Sorry Im confused then as you said locks up the entire command and even worse - it seems to wind up the pool in question for being exported! Which to me read like you where saying the pool ended up being

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de For some security reasons, I dumped via dd a large file onto a 3TB disk. The systems is 11.0-CURRENT #1 r259667: Fri Dec 20 22:43:56 CET 2013 amd64. Filesystem in question is a single ZFS pool. Issuing the command rm

Re: ZFS command can block the whole ZFS subsystem!

2014-01-03 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:38:03 - Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote: - Original Message - From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de For some security reasons, I dumped via dd a large

Re: SVN commit 259045 breaks -CURRENT

2013-12-15 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Stefan Esser s...@freebsd.org To: Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com; Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 1:25 PM Subject: Re: SVN commit 259045 breaks -CURRENT Am 15.12.2013

Re: Overriding sector size on disks?

2013-11-01 Thread Steven Hartland
What does camcontrol identity say? - Original Message - From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-current freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 2:45 AM Subject: Overriding sector size on disks? Hi! I have an odd problem. That, honestly, can't be that

Re: ZFS L2ARC - incorrect size and abnormal system load on r255173

2013-10-28 Thread Steven Hartland
patch not disabling compresion on l2arc? Steven Hartland wrote: SH I would have expected zero for all l2_compress values. SH SH Regards SH Steve SH SH - Original Message - SH From: Vitalij Satanivskij sa...@ukr.net SH To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk SH Cc: Vitalij

  1   2   >