On 24.08.2011 16:59, Victor Detoni wrote:
> Does Someone know if this was fixed?
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Victor Detoni wrote:
>
>> Oh shit guys!
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/dyKLRr0v
>>
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:07.mbuf.asc
Isn't this the one?
//Svein
--
On 21.07.2010 18:33, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote:
> On 2010-07-20 at 14:16, Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
>> Sorry for the late response here, but what you're describing matches
>> fairly well what I saw with RELENG_8 (just after 8.0 was released), but
>> luckily
On 20.07.2010 13:55, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote:
> On 2010-07-20 at 12:17, Marius Strobl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:06:54PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote:
>>> On 2010-07-18 at 14:20, Marius Strobl wrote:
>> Downgrading now...
>
> And it crashed again, with current from r20959
On 19.06.2010 11:58, oizs wrote:
> I tried almost everything raid 0 1 5 10 with all kind of stripes
> 32/64/128 and settings direct io/cached/read-ahead/wt/wb/disk-cache but
> nothing seems to work.
> I changed the card to another dell perc 5 which had an older firmware.
> Tried 4 kind of motherboa
On 18.06.2010 01:50, oizs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've bought a Dell Perc 5/i because I couldn't make the onboard marvell
> 88sx7042 work with 8.0/8.1 or current, but as lucky as I am, the best I
> can do with 4x1.5tb samsung in raid5 is 60MB/s writes and 90MB/s reads,
> with bbu/write-back/adaptive-read
On 12.06.2010 14:57, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> On 10-06-2010 13:46, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
>>> (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
>>> tool
On 01.06.2010 20:57, Vanessa Kraus wrote:
> It's exciting that there may soon be an option other than gcc for
> FreeBSD. However I have a few questions. Is there going to be a system
> in place that will allow port maintainers to say "hey this port is now
> built successfully with Clang" or "hey
On 01.06.2010 16:55, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Attilio Rao writes:
>> I really would like to see CLANG more integrated with FreeBSD only
>> when there are 0 or similar (well-known, already analyzed, listed
>> somewhere, etc.) bugs by the compiler [...]
>
> Does this means you're planning to re
On 08.04.2010 11:05, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Alexander Leidinger writes:
>> Please consider using SVN instead. A lot more users will be able to
>> check out from there.
>
> We don't grant non-committers access to the Subversion repo.
>
>> It looks like other people had a look at sysinstall,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.03.2010 01:49, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:39 PM, jhell wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:42, deischen@ wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Some CC's stripped ]
>>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
P.S. I th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15.03.2010 13:49, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Hi
>
> I originally wasn't going to weigh in on this, but:
>
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4
> options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 #Compatible with FreeBSD5
> options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12.03.2010 15:20, Svein Skogen wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting Amanda (2.6.1p2 from ports) to play nicely
> with my hardware.
>
> Devices are:
>at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (sa0,pass0)
>at scbus0 target 1 lun 1 (pass1,ch0)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.03.2010 16:21, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes:
>> Yes, rewriting by dd or any other way works for reallocating or
>> clearing pending sectors counter, but in server environment
>
> In a server environment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05.03.2010 11:48, Alex Keda wrote:
> On 05.03.2010 12:59, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> On 5 Mar 2010, at 09:56, Alex Keda wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 05.03.2010 12:45, Doug Rabson wrote:
>>>
On 5 Mar 2010, at 09:30, Alex Keda wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
