On 03/20/2018 08:50 AM, Markus Wild wrote:
>
> I had faced the exact same issue on a HP Microserver G8 with 8TB disks and a
> 16TB zpool on FreeBSD 11 about a year ago.
Hello,
I will ask you the same question as I asked the OP:
Has this pool had new vdevs addded to it since the server was instal
On 03/20/2018 12:00 AM, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been encountered suddenly death in ZFS full volume
> machine(r330434) about 10 days after installation[1]:
>
> ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable
> ZFS: can't read MOS of pool zroot
> gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool
nformation available on request.
Best regards,
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ank you for your work!
Best regards
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
ps. bz@ cc'ed so he sees this thread
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 16.10.2011 21:29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote
> in <4e9aa874.5070...@gibfest.dk>:
>
> th> On 14.10.2011 10:26, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> th> > On 14-10-2011 10:09, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> th> >> Thanks. There is no probl
On 14.10.2011 10:26, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> On 14-10-2011 10:09, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>> Thanks. There is no problem with the source address selection.
I don't understand this comment. I would say that I do
have problems with the source address selection -
otherwi
On 14-10-2011 10:09, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Thanks. There is no problem with the source address selection. The
> last questions are:
>
> % route get -inet www.freebsd.org
[tykling@tykburk ~]$ route get -inet www.freebsd.org
route to: red.freebsd.org
destination: default
mask: default
On 14.10.2011 08:14, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
[tykling@tykburk ~]$ telnet www.freebsd.org 80 < /dev/null
Trying 69.147.83.34...
Connected to red.freebsd.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
/Thomas
_
x27;' _user='' _group='' _groups=''
+ [ -n '' ]
+ eval
+ [ start != start ]
+ [ -n ip6addrctl_enable -a start != rcvar -a start != stop ]
+ checkyesno ip6addrctl_enable
+ eval '_value=$ip6addrctl_enable'
+ _value=YES
+ debug 'checkyesno
On 14.10.2011 00:31, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I just upgraded my home workstation to 9.0-beta3 amd64. It seems
> like my web browsers are preferring ipv4 over ipv6 after the upgrade,
My laptop is also running 9.0-beta3 amd64 and I observe
the same behaviour th
g
this correctly. But my browsers still prefer ipv4. Is this a bug, or
do the manpage need updating ?
Before the upgrade to 9 I was running 8-stable which preferred
ipv6 like I would expect.
Thank you in advance,
Thomas Steen Rasmussen
___
freebsd-curre
11 matches
Mail list logo
