Re: gptzfsboot grew a lot after skein support was added; need knob to control bloat

Shawn Webb wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:30:17PM -0500, Allan Jude wrote: On 2017-01-27 12:05, Warner Losh wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Toomas Soome wrote: On 27. jaan 2017, at 1:40, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: Hi, I tried

Re: Import rcorder-visualize.sh from NetBSD?

Eric van Gyzen wrote: Would anyone object to me importing this script from NetBSD? http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sbin/rcorder/rcorder-visualize.sh?rev=1.5=text/plain I ask in particular because of the non-BSD license. This seems like a no-brainer, but I'm going to play it

Re: External toolchain support broken for devel/llvm38 but not devel/llvm37

Matthew Macy wrote: It looks like there is something broken with the devel/llvm38 port or external toolchain support has regressed: This works: make XCC=/usr/local/bin/clang37 XCXX=/usr/local/bin/clang++37 XCPP=/usr/local/bin/clang-cpp37 buildworld -j12 -s This fails: make

[patch] bug 187081 (swaplate fix)

Hi all. I recently added my own patch to bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187081 Can anyone take a look? -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: boot failure after upgrade to HEAD from svn: zfs i/o error - all block copies unavailable invalid format

10.12.2013 18:59, 乔楚 wrote: *Today, after **upgrade to HEAD from svn, My FreeBSD can't boot.* *Error message:* *ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavailable **Invalid format* I see you are using GPT. Have you updated bootcode then? Can you import your pool from any HEAD snapshot? -- Sphinx

Re: lang/gcc not build

26.11.2013 19:47, Alexander Panyushkin wrote: #portmaster lang/gcc [...] cd /usr/ports/lang/gcc/work/gcc-4.6.4 ; contrib/gcc_update --touch configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site checking build system type... x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.0 checking host system type...

Re: cron(8) improvement

05.11.2013 20:21, Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, Nov 5, 2013, at 11:37, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: On 11/05/13 12:31, Allan Jude wrote: This came up in discussion on IRC and I thought I should throw it at the list so I don't forget. A user was asking how to do what linux cron does, where there is a

bmake vs fmake - ports-mgmt/portconf fails to work

Hi all. I'm playing with 10 beta1 and found that: /usr/ports/editors/vim# make make: /etc/make.conf line 17: warning: WITH_BDB_VER=5 make: /etc/make.conf line 18: Need an operator make: /etc/make.conf line 17: warning: _JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_7 make:

Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc

23.08.2013 12:58, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: I don't know if you are aware that IF you really do that we will have serious problems to ship packages for 10. USE_GCC=any is the fallback in the portstree for all ports that are unable to build with clang which was introduced when HEAD switched to

Re: ports/177488: qemu-1.4

2013-03-30 10:23, Juergen Lock wrote: disable some unneeded function, and make qemu 1.4 compilable on FreeBSD 9.1 I think you are building qemu git head as the hexdump function at least isn't in 1.4.0? Anyway I have meanwhile updated the qemu-devel port to 1.4.0 with some similar patches to

Re: CURRENT: lang/gcc fails to build on CURRENT with error: configure: error: no usable dependency style found

11.03.2013 18:57, O. Hartmann пишет: On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:29 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2013-03-11 14:15, Niclas Zeising wrote: BSD grep does something very strange here: $ echo 'foo.bar' | grep foo.bar foo.bar $ echo 'foo.barx' | grep foo.bar foo.barx $ echo 'sub/foo.bar' | grep

Re: Circular port dependency

11.01.2013 03:21, George Mitchell: I grabbed the ports tree as of 308518, the RELEASE_9_1_0 tag. The current and supported version of ports is HEAD. devel/libtool won't build, because it requires autom4te during the Can you provide some logs showing how it can't be built? configure

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

18.12.2012 00:20, Andriy Gapon: It's been already mentioned many times that ZFS works much better on amd64. It's up to a (potential) user to understand limitations of i386 and to decide whether to use ZFS, in what situations and how. You may want to consider using KSTACK_PAGES=4 in your kernel

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

13.12.2012 12:25, Andriy Gapon: on 12/12/2012 21:35 Dimitry Andric said the following: Especially the recursive spa_load and traverse_visitbp calls are scary, because that can grow out of hand very quickly. It is probably tricky to remove the recursion... Re-entering spa_load once is normal

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

12.12.2012 21:35, Dimitry Andric: On 2012-12-12 14:04, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 04.12.2012 00:41, Konstantin Belousov: Please try the patch below. It might give an immediate relief, but still there are many offenders in the backtrace. I'm having almost the same issue and the patch doesn't

Re: clang compiled kernel panic when mounting zfs root on i386

04.12.2012 00:41, Konstantin Belousov: Please try the patch below. It might give an immediate relief, but still there are many offenders in the backtrace. I'm having almost the same issue and the patch doesn't work for me. Trying to mount root from zfs:limb0 []... Fatal double fault: eip =

Re: No ATA disks on 9.1-RC3

19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote: ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: WDC WD1600BEVT-00A0RT0 01.01A01 ATA-8 SATA 2.x device ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 152627MB (312581809 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)

Re: No ATA disks on 9.1-RC3

19.11.2012 10:59, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 19.11.2012 10:24, Alex Keda wrote: ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 ada0: WDC WD1600BEVT-00A0RT0 01.01A01 ATA-8 SATA 2.x device ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 152627MB

Re: No ATA disks on 9.1-RC3

19.11.2012 15:01, Alex Keda wrote: It's not build config: === root@HP:/usr/src # vim /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/HP # include GENERIC ident HPKERNEL nodevice ata nodevice siis device atacore device ataati device ataahci Looks like I have missed `device atapci` here. =

Re: No ATA disks on 9.1-RC3

19.11.2012 15:59, Alex Keda wrote: 19.11.2012 17:18, Volodymyr Kostyrko пишет: 19.11.2012 15:01, Alex Keda wrote: It's not build config: === root@HP:/usr/src # vim /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/HP # include GENERIC ident HPKERNEL nodevice ata nodevice siis device atacore device ataati

Re: Buying recommendation for silent router/fileserver

11.10.2012 17:54, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hey guys, I need to replace an aging Pentium IV system that has been serving as my router, access point, file- and mediaserver for quite some time now. The replacement should have: - amd64 CPU (for ZFS, obviously) - 2x GigE (igress, egress interfaces) -

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

04.10.2012 13:53, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days. If you have any objection, please raise it now.

Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming GNU sort removal

05.10.2012 13:57, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 04.10.2012 13:53, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days

Re: FreeBSD development audio system: KLANG

O. Hartmann wrote: A few days ago, I stumbled into sthis at Phoronix: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTE1NzY KLANG is supposed to be an exchange audio system for the kernel, replacing several userland backed systems. Phoronix also claims this approach is supposed to support

Re: New Xorg: graphics/dri: fails to compile with CLANG: nouveau_array.c:49:16: error: illegal storage class on function, *extract_u = EXTRACT(char, unsigned, 1);

Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-04-28 13:12, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Is there in official way to get this fixed with CLANG? I see that files folder in graphics/dri is missing, so none of the fixes for both the faulty source files I think the patch should go to graphics

does anyone care about periodic scripts?

Hi all. It seems that patches to periodic scripts have hard time coming into the tree. I personally filed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/165817 and still there's no move despite change is purely cosmetical and just fixes right way of things. And this is not just one and

Re: New Xorg: graphics/dri: fails to compile with CLANG: nouveau_array.c:49:16: error: illegal storage class on function, *extract_u = EXTRACT(char, unsigned, 1);

O. Hartmann wrote: Is there in official way to get this fixed with CLANG? I see that files folder in graphics/dri is missing, so none of the fixes for both the faulty source files I think the patch should go to graphics/libGL. cd /usr/ports/graphics/libGL/files fetch -rao -

Re: About kern.ipc.semmap on FreeBSD 9

Efraín Déctor wrote: Hello. I’m currently testing FreeBSD 9.0, I want to use it as a OS for a PostgreSQL Server. However, it is recommended to modified some paramerts such as semaphores (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html ): kern.ipc.semmap=256 But when I tried

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

Alex Keda wrote: On 10.02.2012 21:07, Chuck Burns wrote: set prompt = [%n@%m]%c04%# it's not needed need some as alias ll ls -lAhG alias ls ls -G set autolist = TAB bindkey \e[3~ delete-char . and other _really_ necessary settings This can be as simple as defining CLICOLOR. However

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

Chris Rees wrote: set prompt = [%n@%m]%c04%# it's not needed need some as alias ll ls -lAhG alias ls ls -G Lscolors are an abomination. -F or nothing at all is better; remember some people will use white xterms etc. Yeah, a +1 for me. Plain xterm with colorized output

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious issue: http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though certainly doesn't limit itself to just that screen) is almost entirely corrupt. It's an

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious issue: http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though certainly doesn't limit itself to just that screen) is almost entirely corrupt. It's an

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

Eitan Adler wrote: set filec - set history = 100 - set savehist = 100 + set history = 1 + set savehist = 1 Just why not (1 merge)? + set autolist + # Use history to aid expansion + set autoexpand set mail =

Re: FreeBSD 9 recompile ports

George Kontostanos wrote: Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port rebuild. The relevant post is here:

Re: periodic emails

04.01.2012 13:57, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Does security_show_success=YES suppress the security report entirely (no mail sent), if no security related issues found? Yes. PS: I also prefer setting *_show_badconfig to 'yes' in case something is just not working right. -- Sphinx of black quartz

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

15.12.2011 15:48, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I'm getting to the point where I'm considering formulating a private mail to Jeff Roberson, requesting that he be aware of the discussion that's happening (not that he necessarily follow or read it), and that based on what I can tell we're at a roadblock

Re: replacement of ataidle for freebsd 9

23.10.2011 11:12, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote: In the mentime, can you please advice how can I use camcontrol in order to disable APM for my HDD? @reboot camcontrol idle ada0 -t 300 ; camcontrol idle ada1 -t 300 -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.

BETA3 core dump

Hi all. BETA3 dumps core on running heavy disk bound application. Built with clang and kernel is custom, but I can try to reproduce it on GENERIC if that matters. http://limbo.xim.bz/core.txt.0 -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. ___

Re: BETA3 core dump

01.10.2011 13:20, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: BETA3 dumps core on running heavy disk bound application. Built with clang and kernel is custom, but I can try to reproduce it on GENERIC if that matters. http://limbo.xim.bz/core.txt.0 Sorry, I've fixed permissions. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

09.09.2011 11:52, Dimitry Andric wrote: I did a few test builds with 'high' CPU values for -march, and I ran into various problems. I'd discourage the use of -march=native for now, at least with clang. It will take some time to investigate. Hey, I already posted results of build without -march

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 17:44, Olivier Smedts wrote: You mean like fully rebuilding system with gcc and -march=athlon-xp and then try again? Like cleaning /usr/obj/ and then buildworld with clang but with -march=athlon-xp instead of -march=native. As the problem does not seem to be in your current world

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 15:34, Olivier Smedts wrote: Hm, sorry that I did not notice it before, but maybe you are having the issue described here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026594.html I think it's more like the following issue, which is not new :

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 16:04, Olivier Smedts wrote: I think it's more like the following issue, which is not new : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-May/024509.html Nope, my current world was built by gcc. The problem is not the current world but the bootstrap clang built with

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 15:01, Dimitry Andric wrote: Hm, sorry that I did not notice it before, but maybe you are having the issue described here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026594.html What is your current kernel revision? Can't remember and the machine is offline

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 16:25, Olivier Smedts wrote: What is your processor ? Athlon XP 2500+ I noticed breakage on recent intel processors too, but haven't yet stumbled upon them using -march=native on this one. Can you compile the Host.cpp file referenced in :

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 15:01, Dimitry Andric wrote: Hm, sorry that I did not notice it before, but maybe you are having the issue described here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-August/026594.html What is your current kernel revision? I'm very sorry, my kernel is somewhat older

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 16:25, Olivier Smedts wrote: Can you compile the Host.cpp file referenced in : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-May/024499.html And see which arch the resulting binary detects ? %clang++ Host.cpp -o Host %./Host cpu = corei7 cpu = athlon-xp Also, do you

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

05.09.2011 10:43, Olivier Smedts wrote: === libexec/atrun (all) clang -O2 -pipe -march=native -DATJOB_DIR=\/var/at/jobs/\ -DLFILE=\/var/at/jobs/.lockfile\ -DLOADAVG_MX=1.5 -DATSPOOL_DIR=\/var/at/spool\ -DVERSION=\2.9\ -DDAEMON_UID=1 -DDAEMON_GID=1 -DDEFAULT_BATCH_QUEUE=\'E\'

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

06.09.2011 01:11, Olivier Smedts wrote: ===libexec/atrun (all) clang -O2 -pipe -march=native -DATJOB_DIR=\/var/at/jobs/\ -DLFILE=\/var/at/jobs/.lockfile\ -DLOADAVG_MX=1.5 -DATSPOOL_DIR=\/var/at/spool\ -DVERSION=\2.9\ -DDAEMON_UID=1 -DDAEMON_GID=1 -DDEFAULT_BATCH_QUEUE=\'E\'

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

04.09.2011 00:15, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-09-03 22:58, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 03.09.2011 23:43, Dimitry Andric ???(??): On 2011-09-03 22:22, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: ... .if ${CC:T} == clang CFLAGS+= -Qunused-arguments -fPIC .endif You should not unconditionally add -fPIC

Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

Hi all. === libexec/bootpd (all) /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/clang -O2 -pipe -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -march=native -DETC_ETHERS -DSYSLOG -DDEBUG -DVEND_CMU -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -Wformat=2

Re: Compiling BETA2 with clang fails

03.09.2011 23:43, Dimitry Andric написав(ла): On 2011-09-03 22:22, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: Hi all. === libexec/bootpd (all) ... /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/clang -O2 -pipe -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -march=native -DETC_ETHERS -DSYSLOG -DDEBUG -DVEND_CMU -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

30.08.2011 12:30, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 08/29/2011 10:58 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: If that page would be updated at least monthly giving fair comparison with other os'es it could serve a big pros list for preferring FreeBSD over other systems. I dont think a monthly update

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

30.08.2011 12:23, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: [Taking random email.] I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html The pages serve different purposes. There's no point in elaborating about feature X if feature X

Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html

27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: This website should be brushed up or taken offline! It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html I think this one would better look like list of major features with os comparison, like: =

Re: ZFS boot fails with two pools

07.07.2011 09:22, Berczi Gabor нwrote: On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: 1. Check that pools have up-to-date boot code. I tried 8.2 and HEAD. You mean gpart+gptzfsboot+pmbr, right? Yep. 2. Try to convince bios to boot from the disk of pool2. There is no disk

Re: ZFS boot fails with two pools

06.07.2011 18:44, Berczi Gabor wrote: Greets, For some reason FreeBSD can't boot automatically: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS object directory Can't find root filesystem - giving up ZFS: unexpected object set type 0 ZFS: unexpected object set type 0

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

23.06.2011 19:31, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two years with no problems. I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on TMPFS either. Maybe i'm missing something but

Re: ZFS import panic with r219703

17.03.2011 01:03, Freddie Cash wrote: Anytime I try to import my pool built using 24x HAST devices, I get the following message, and the system reboots: panic: solaris assert: dmu_free_range(os, smo-smo_object, 0, -1ULL, tx) == 0, file:

Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!

28.02.2011 15:24, lhmwzy wrote: Tks for PJD's work for zfs. Would V28 is the last version of zfs because oracle don't open the zfs code after V28? 1. Oracle opens the code, but only after some time. AFAIR they do open the code after the major releases. 2. All head developers have quit

On the modules

When I was compiling the modules I face the following situation. While its possible to compile kernel even with -O3 -pipe, the modules still copmpiled with -O -pipe. Where I can change this? The search in the /sys/compile returns nothing... Next. What would be with the modules in future?

Re: Scheduler changes?

On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 08:28:06PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: It's an issue. Nice values count for less than before due to fixes that Luoqi Chen made (and I committed). The behavior now isn't optimal, but it is better than the system locking up. NICE_WEIGHT might be okay to