Garrett Wollman wrote:
> `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read
> and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and
> `#endif' can be recognized).
I thought that the other discussion had concluded that:
#if 0
...
#else
Or:
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> In , I see:
>
> #if __GNUC__
> #warning "No user-serviceable parts inside."
> #endif
>
> Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
> #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files?
Yes. It is a preprocessor directive specific the GCC preprocessor.
This was discussed in gre
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> >By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error
> >on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of
> >an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them.
>
>
At 2:33 PM -0500 3/8/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
By adding that #warning, you are going to have a compile-time error
on some compilers, whether or not you want it. Hiding it inside of
an #if/#endif will help for some compilers, but not on all of them.
Er, I should note that I do like the idea of
At 10:48 AM -0800 3/8/03, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:28:13PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to
> read and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else'
> and `#endif' can be recognized).
I don't thin
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:28:13PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> `#if __GNUC__' wouldn't help matters; every preprocessor has to read
> and interpret every preprocessor directive (so that `#else' and
> `#endif' can be recognized).
I don't think preprocessors should interpret directives when t
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 11:19:43AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In , I see:
>
> #if __GNUC__
> #warning "No user-serviceable parts inside."
> #endif
>
>
> Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
> #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working
> on something similar for
In the last episode (Mar 08), Garrett Wollman said:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:19:43 -0500, Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
> > #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files?
>
> No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive
> ins
< said:
> Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
> #if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files?
No, it needs to be replaced by the standard `#error' directive
instead. I asked portmgr to do a run on the portsd cluster with this
change to look for ports that mistakenly include this file, but I
Hi,
In , I see:
#if __GNUC__
#warning "No user-serviceable parts inside."
#endif
Does the use of #warning need to be protected by
#if __GNUC__ in FreeBSD header files? I am working
on something similar for .
Some other header files check for __GNUC__ before using #warning,
such as , but does
10 matches
Mail list logo
