On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:11:29AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: There I go reply to all... sigh
:
: IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
: *latest* version in the 3.x series.
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.312
diff -u -r1.312 Makefile.inc1
--- Makefile.inc1 14 Nov 2002 19:24:50
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:28:50AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.312
diff
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
While I can't put a lot of time into supporting ru's efforts, and I agree
that the policy should be
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
[
current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
dougb@ Cc:'ed to be aware of possible mergemaster(8) problems.
Thanks.
1. smmsp user was missing from /etc/passwd and /etc/group
2. installed 4.0 kernel did not have the
Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
While I can't put a lot of time into supporting ru's efforts, and I agree
that
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:15:39AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
While I can't put a lot of time
Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I've attempted to overcome 1) as suggested by UPDATING, by running
the ``mergemaster -p'' (from src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/). This did
not work well because mergemaster(8) attempted to use stat(1) which
is not present in 4.0.
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I've attempted to overcome 1) as suggested by UPDATING, by running
the ``mergemaster -p'' (from src/usr.sbin/mergemaster/). This did
not work well because mergemaster(8) attempted to
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:19:17AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
DB I'm not sure how to solve this problem non-invasively. One way to deal
DB with it would be to include the instructions to install stat(1) if needed
DB in UPDATING, but then if the upgrade fails for whatever reason, the user
DB
[
current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
dougb@ Cc:'ed to be aware of possible mergemaster(8) problems.
imp@ Cc:'ed to be aware of incorrect UPDATING instruction.
peter@ Cc:'ed to LOL about foot-shooting with anti-foot-shooting.
re@ Cc:'ed to consider approving the
There I go reply to all... sigh
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
[
current@ Cc:'ed because it'll be useful to a number of upgraders.
dougb@ Cc:'ed to be
[Cc: to re@ dropped to avoid unnecessary load]
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
There I go reply to all... sigh
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200,
Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of;
There I go reply to all... sigh
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:15:00PM -0200,
Daniel C. Sobral said words to the effect of;
There I go reply to all... sigh
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel C. Sobral [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: There I go reply to all... sigh
:
: IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
: *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
: here.
ru@ has stepped up to
Hey ru!
These patches are only one '/' different from what I build on my 4.3,
4.5 and 4.6.2 systems w/o a new make being installed. All built
perfectly! Thanks!
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
There I go reply to all... sigh
IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the
*latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy
here.
Agree, I don't see any use in
18 matches
Mail list logo