On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:42:26AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi Bapt current@
I think keeping a fully functionnal roff(7) toolchain part of the
base system is very good on a unix.
Yes, Unix has always also been a tool to get jobs done (aka PWB),
as well as merely recompile more
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
|On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:42:26AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
| I think keeping a fully functionnal roff(7) toolchain part of the
| base system is very good on a unix.
| From what I could check I cannot find any regression when \
| migrating
Steffen Nurpmeso sdao...@yandex.com wrote:
It seems you haven't checked at all.
It seems to me that e.g. mdoc(7) of n-t-r seems to require quite
a bit of work in order to be at all usable.
This is not completely true. It is usable, I did check it with all about 7000
manpages in the base of
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:37:22PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
|On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:42:26AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
| I think keeping a fully functionnal roff(7) toolchain part of the
| base system is very good on a unix.
|
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Hello,
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
|On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:37:22PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
| Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
||On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:42:26AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey
Hello,
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
|On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:37:22PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
| Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
||On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:42:26AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
|
|| I think keeping a fully functionnal roff(7) toolchain
Hi Bapt current@
I think keeping a fully functionnal roff(7) toolchain part of the
base system is very good on a unix.
Yes, Unix has always also been a tool to get jobs done (aka PWB),
as well as merely recompile more Unix. Ditto FreeBSD.
From what I could check I cannot find any
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:13:18AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
- it is partially
On 14 May 2015, at 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
- it is partially CDDL partially BSD license.
We currently have a WITHOUT_CDDL knob
On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
- it is partially CDDL partially BSD license.
We currently have a WITHOUT_CDDL knob that some people use. If we don’t build
the CDDL parts, what will break?
David
___
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 01:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
- it is partially CDDL partially BSD license.
We currently have a WITHOUT_CDDL knob that some people use. If we don’t
build the CDDL parts, what will
On May 13, 2015, at 17:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I plan to work in replacing GNU groff for FreeBSD 11.0 in base by heirloom
doctools.
…
Hi Bapt,
Do you have a list of items that require doctools [if groff isn’t
present]?
Thanks!
-NGie
signature.asc
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:31:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 13, 2015, at 17:02, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I plan to work in replacing GNU groff for FreeBSD 11.0 in base by heirloom
doctools.
…
Hi Bapt,
Do you have a list of items that
On 14 May 2015, at 10:24, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:13:18AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:55:19AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 14 May 2015, at
Hi,
I plan to work in replacing GNU groff for FreeBSD 11.0 in base by heirloom
doctools.
This mostly concern documentation in share/docs and the fallback when mandoc(1)
is not able to render a manpage.
Heirloom doctools has progressed a lot recently and is now able to render
correctly all the
On Thu, 14 May 2015 02:02:11 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote
Hi,
I plan to work in replacing GNU groff for FreeBSD 11.0 in base by heirloom
doctools.
This mostly concern documentation in share/docs and the fallback when
mandoc(1) is not able to render a manpage.
+1
Great idea.
Pedro.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
17 matches
Mail list logo