Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT : http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch on the latest -CURRENT but that's because the changes have already been added. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk: On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT : http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch on the latest -CURRENT but that's because the changes have already been added. Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it failed. -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it failed. It looks like there are two patches to sysmacros.h - the first adds SIGNOF and highbit and the second then removes the file. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it failed. It looks like there are two patches to sysmacros.h - the first adds SIGNOF and highbit and the second then removes the file. Not the same sysmacros.h, the one patched is sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/sysmacros.h, the other one you referenced (sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h) is removed by the patch. BTW, even for the first one, I have no problem applying the patch cleanly on 9-CURRENT, svn revision 219027. -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 13:08 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: Not the same sysmacros.h, the one patched is sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/sysmacros.h, the other one you referenced (sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h) is removed by the patch. So it is - apologies for the noise. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for import:
vdev_children: 1
version: 6
vdev_tree:
children[0]:
phys_path: '/dev/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
path: '/dev/dsk/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
zdb: can't open 'blah': No such file or directory
Exit 1
How about below diff then?
%%
--- cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c~
+++ cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c
@@ -1129,7 +1129,11 @@ zpool_find_import_impl(libzfs_handle_t *
char *end, **dir = iarg-path;
size_t pathleft;
nvlist_t *ret = NULL;
+#ifdef sun
static char *default_dir = /dev/dsk;
+#else
+ static char *default_dir = /dev;
+#endif
pool_list_t pools = { 0 };
pool_entry_t *pe, *penext;
vdev_entry_t *ve, *venext;
%%
$ zdb -p /dev -ec blah
Traversing all blocks to verify metadata checksums and verify nothing
leaked ...
Assertion failed: (mp-initialized == B_TRUE), file
/usr/src/cddl/lib/libzpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c,
line 130.
Exit 134
I can't reproduce anymore, at least as of ch188544.
Has there been any recent developments with these patches (eg. Will they
apply and build on latest checkouts?) ?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2011/2/23 Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for import:
vdev_children: 1
version: 6
vdev_tree:
children[0]:
phys_path: '/dev/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
path: '/dev/dsk/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
zdb: can't open 'blah': No such file or directory
Exit 1
How about below diff then?
%%
--- cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c~
+++ cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c
@@ -1129,7 +1129,11 @@ zpool_find_import_impl(libzfs_handle_t *
char *end, **dir = iarg-path;
size_t pathleft;
nvlist_t *ret = NULL;
+#ifdef sun
static char *default_dir = /dev/dsk;
+#else
+ static char *default_dir = /dev;
+#endif
pool_list_t pools = { 0 };
pool_entry_t *pe, *penext;
vdev_entry_t *ve, *venext;
%%
$ zdb -p /dev -ec blah
Traversing all blocks to verify metadata checksums and verify nothing
leaked ...
Assertion failed: (mp-initialized == B_TRUE), file
/usr/src/cddl/lib/libzpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c,
line 130.
Exit 134
I can't reproduce anymore, at least as of ch188544.
Has there been any recent developments with these patches (eg. Will they
apply and build on latest checkouts?) ?
I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT :
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz
If you want patches for 8-STABLE, look at the directory contents.
Cheers
--
Olivier Smedts _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X
www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \
Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for import:
vdev_children: 1
version: 6
vdev_tree:
children[0]:
phys_path: '/dev/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
path: '/dev/dsk/gptid/A-B-C-D-E'
zdb: can't open 'blah': No such file or directory
Exit 1
How about below diff then?
%%
--- cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c~
+++ cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_import.c
@@ -1129,7 +1129,11 @@ zpool_find_import_impl(libzfs_handle_t *
char *end, **dir = iarg-path;
size_t pathleft;
nvlist_t *ret = NULL;
+#ifdef sun
static char *default_dir = /dev/dsk;
+#else
+ static char *default_dir = /dev;
+#endif
pool_list_t pools = { 0 };
pool_entry_t *pe, *penext;
vdev_entry_t *ve, *venext;
%%
$ zdb -p /dev -ec blah
Traversing all blocks to verify metadata checksums and verify nothing
leaked ...
Assertion failed: (mp-initialized == B_TRUE), file
/usr/src/cddl/lib/libzpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c,
line 130.
Exit 134
I can't reproduce anymore, at least as of ch188544.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:40AM +0200, Andrei Kolu wrote:
2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
You can also download the whole source tree already patched from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/zfs_20101212.tbz
# uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd9.raidon.eu 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Dec
14 14:37:01 EET 2010
r...@freebsd9.raidon.eu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Create files filled with zeroes:
# mkfile 512m disk1 disk2 disk3 disk4
# zpool create andmed raidz /home/antik/disk{1,2,3,4}
# zpool status andmed
pool: andmed
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
andmed ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
/home/antik/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
/home/antik/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0
/home/antik/disk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
/home/antik/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Now let's try to scrub:
# zpool scrub andmed
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 01
fault virtual address = 0x1fb8007b
fault code = supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x812967d2
stack pointer = 0x20:0xff80ee605548
frame pointer = 0x28:0xff80ee605730
code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 2081 (initial thread)
[ thread pid 2081 tid 100121 ]
Stopped at vdev_file_open+0x92: testb $0x20,0x7b(%rax)
Could you verify if this patch fixes the problem for you?
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/vdev_file.c.2.patch
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com
p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
pgplp1JmNuuvJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:54:36AM +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wrote: I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made: 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD) 2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that I haven't used SVN repository] 3. Applied the patch in question. 4. Created a zpool raidz of two disks of old version 15. Also some usual tuning of ZFS in loader.conf was done as I am running 32 bit version with low amount of memory. zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf was added too. 4.1 Moved /usr/ports to ZFS to have some files on it. 5. Make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld - all the canonical steps from the Handbook. 6. After reboot to final 9.0-CURRENT world I got a dmesg with some trace stack related to ZFS and also a rc.d script message about unrecognized command 'volinit' (see the text of it in attachment). This one is because mergemaster(8) skips files with the same $FreeBSD$ value, so you need to copy /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zvol to /etc/rc.d/ by hand. 7. Nevertheless the system booted. Files 8. `zpool upgrade -a` worked all right and reported that now I have ZFS version 28 Overall I am pleasantly surprised how streamlined the whole process was. That's good to hear, thanks. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgp5O7SANNIX6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes: The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 `-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default $ zdb -ec blah Configuration for import: vdev_children: 1 version: 6 vdev_tree: children[0]: phys_path: '/dev/gptid/A-B-C-D-E' path: '/dev/dsk/gptid/A-B-C-D-E' zdb: can't open 'blah': No such file or directory Exit 1 $ zdb -p /dev -ec blah Traversing all blocks to verify metadata checksums and verify nothing leaked ... Assertion failed: (mp-initialized == B_TRUE), file /usr/src/cddl/lib/libzpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common/kernel.c, line 130. Exit 134 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:29:14 +0300, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote: 2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) ggg_m...@inbox.ru: I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made: 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD) 2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that I haven't used SVN repository] 3. Applied the patch in question. 4. Created a zpool raidz of two disks of old version 15. Also some usual tuning of ZFS in loader.conf was done as I am running 32 bit version with low amount of memory. zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf was added too. 4.1 Moved /usr/ports to ZFS to have some files on it. 5. Make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld - all the canonical steps from the Handbook. 6. After reboot to final 9.0-CURRENT world I got a dmesg with some trace stack related to ZFS and also a rc.d script message about unrecognized command 'volinit' (see the text of it in attachment). Did you run mergemaster correctly ? Yes, `mergemaster -p` - `make installworld` - `mergemaster` sequence was performed according to the Handbook. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
I got more stacktraces in course of compilation of bash, see the updated dmesg. By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads. On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:54:36 +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) ggg_m...@inbox.ru wrote: I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made: 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD) 2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that I haven't used SVN repository] 3. Applied the patch in question. 4. Created a zpool raidz of two disks of old version 15. Also some usual tuning of ZFS in loader.conf was done as I am running 32 bit version with low amount of memory. zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf was added too. 4.1 Moved /usr/ports to ZFS to have some files on it. 5. Make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld - all the canonical steps from the Handbook. 6. After reboot to final 9.0-CURRENT world I got a dmesg with some trace stack related to ZFS and also a rc.d script message about unrecognized command 'volinit' (see the text of it in attachment). 7. Nevertheless the system booted. Files 8. `zpool upgrade -a` worked all right and reported that now I have ZFS version 28 Overall I am pleasantly surprised how streamlined the whole process was. I am going to perform more tourturing of this VM later as well. Thanks for your work!Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Dec 16 02:53:13 MSK 2010 r...@bsdtest.localnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz (2171.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6fb Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 11 Features=0x783fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2 Features2=0x209SSE3,MON,SSSE3 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 671023104 (639 MB) avail memory = 637427712 (607 MB) pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: VBOX VBOXXSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: 32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xd000-0xd00f at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 vgapci0: VGA-compatible display mem 0xe000-0xe0ff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci0 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.3 port 0xd010-0xd017 mem 0xf000-0xf001 irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci0 em0: Ethernet address: 08:00:27:05:9b:9f pci0: base peripheral at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci0: multimedia, audio at device 5.0 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xf0804000-0xf0804fff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci0 usbus0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 pci0: bridge at device 7.0 (no driver attached) ehci0: Intel 82801FB (ICH6) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xf0805000-0xf0805fff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 usbus1: EHCI version 1.0 usbus1: Intel 82801FB (ICH6) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port 0xd300-0xd3ff mem 0xf082-0xf083,0xf084-0xf085 irq 9 at device 20.0 on pci0 mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.0.0 battery0: ACPI Control Method Battery on acpi0 acpi_acad0: AC Adapter on acpi0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: PS/2 Mouse irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 attimer0: AT timer port 0x40-0x43,0x50-0x53 on acpi0 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 0xc-0xc8fff,0xe2000-0xe2fff pnpid ORM on isa0 sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 atrtc0: AT realtime clock at port 0x70 irq 8 on isa0 Event timer RTC frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 ppc0: parallel port not found. Timecounter TSC frequency 2171848610 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ad0: 16384MB VBOX HARDDISK
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On 17/12/2010 08:56, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wrote: By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads. Run blogbench and bonnie++ at the same time, possibly with tarring and untarring /usr/ports. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org: Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running v28 or boot from your existing pools. When booting my v15 mirrored pool with only one disk available, I've got some zfs debug messages in the console (but everything works fine) : Dec 18 00:31:55 q kernel: Trying to mount root from zfs:tank/freebsd []... Dec 18 00:31:55 q kernel: log_sysevent: type 19 is not implemented Dec 18 00:31:55 q kernel: log_sysevent: type 19 is not implemented -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On 12/15/2010 23:19, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks! Only strange thing is the rc script complains: /etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: zvol_start unrecognized command 'volinit' usage: zfs command args ... Did you run mergemaster(8) after the upgrade? The patch includes change to etc/rc.d/zvol to remove 'zfs volinit'/'zfs volfini' which are no longer available. By default mergemaster will only notice the change if the $FreeBSD id changes, which it generally would not for a patch. The -s option will deal with this, but it may be less work to just cp the file. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
First of all, thank pjd@, mm@ and others who made zfs go ahead in FreeBSD! You are absolutely monsters! Now one question, what I do wrong, that I can't use /boot/zfsboot to boot MBR+zfs-only FreeBSD? More info. If I use /boot/zfsboot form recent STABLE (from snapshot CD or built myself) to boot up this monstro# gpart show ad6 = 63 625142385 ad6 MBR (298G) 63 1048722571 ntfs [active] (50G) 104872320 5202701282 freebsd (248G) monstro# gpart show ad6s2 =0 520270128 ad6s2 BSD (248G) 0 516075824 1 freebsd-zfs (246G) 5160758244194304 2 freebsd-swap (2.0G) I install /boot/zfsboot as dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ad6s2 count=1 dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ad6s2a skip=1 seek=1024 when I reboot, system stuck in - or \ or / or finaly | prompt. when I install /boot/zfsboot from recent 9-CURRENT snapshot CD all boots-up perfectly. More over, fresh built /boot/zfsboot from v28 pachset either from 8-S or 9-C patches stuck as I describe above. What I miss? Can somebody send me known to work copy of /boot/zfsboot from v28 patchset? Thanks! -- WBR, Alexander V. Ribchansky AVR39-RIPE ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org: Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running v28 or boot from your existing pools. Boot support ok with gptzfsboot and zfsloader on a mirrored v15 root pool and a single disk v15 root pool. # zfs diff tank/d...@20101204 tank/d...@20101208 Cannot stat /data/.zfs/shares/: unable to generate diffs # ls /data/.zfs/ snapshot/ This pool was created in -STABLE more than a year ago, I think it was zpool version 13. I upgraded it to version 15, upgraded the filesystems, but there are no shares directories in the .zfs folder of the filesystems in this pool. Another pool created few days ago directly in version 15 : # ls /temp/.zfs/ shares/ snapshot/ I never used shares in any of my pools/filesystems. Should the .zfs/shares directories be created automatically ? Thanks -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org: Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running v28 or boot from your existing pools. Boot support ok with gptzfsboot and zfsloader on a mirrored v15 root pool and a single disk v15 root pool. # zfs diff tank/d...@20101204 tank/d...@20101208 Cannot stat /data/.zfs/shares/: unable to generate diffs # ls /data/.zfs/ snapshot/ This pool was created in -STABLE more than a year ago, I think it was zpool version 13. I upgraded it to version 15, upgraded the filesystems, but there are no shares directories in the .zfs folder of the filesystems in this pool. Another pool created few days ago directly in version 15 : # ls /temp/.zfs/ shares/ snapshot/ I never used shares in any of my pools/filesystems. Should the .zfs/shares directories be created automatically ? Thanks -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made: 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD) 2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that I haven't used SVN repository] 3. Applied the patch in question. 4. Created a zpool raidz of two disks of old version 15. Also some usual tuning of ZFS in loader.conf was done as I am running 32 bit version with low amount of memory. zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf was added too. 4.1 Moved /usr/ports to ZFS to have some files on it. 5. Make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld - all the canonical steps from the Handbook. 6. After reboot to final 9.0-CURRENT world I got a dmesg with some trace stack related to ZFS and also a rc.d script message about unrecognized command 'volinit' (see the text of it in attachment). 7. Nevertheless the system booted. Files 8. `zpool upgrade -a` worked all right and reported that now I have ZFS version 28 Overall I am pleasantly surprised how streamlined the whole process was. I am going to perform more tourturing of this VM later as well. Thanks for your work!Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Dec 16 02:53:13 MSK 2010 r...@bsdtest.localnet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz (2171.85-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6fb Family = 6 Model = f Stepping = 11 Features=0x783fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2 Features2=0x209SSE3,MON,SSSE3 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM AMD Features2=0x1LAHF TSC: P-state invariant real memory = 671023104 (639 MB) avail memory = 637427712 (607 MB) pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: VBOX VBOXXSDT on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: Sleep Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: 32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xd000-0xd00f at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 vgapci0: VGA-compatible display mem 0xe000-0xe0ff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci0 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.3 port 0xd010-0xd017 mem 0xf000-0xf001 irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci0 em0: Ethernet address: 08:00:27:05:9b:9f pci0: base peripheral at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci0: multimedia, audio at device 5.0 (no driver attached) ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xf0804000-0xf0804fff irq 11 at device 6.0 on pci0 usbus0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 pci0: bridge at device 7.0 (no driver attached) ehci0: Intel 82801FB (ICH6) USB 2.0 controller mem 0xf0805000-0xf0805fff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 usbus1: EHCI version 1.0 usbus1: Intel 82801FB (ICH6) USB 2.0 controller on ehci0 mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port 0xd300-0xd3ff mem 0xf082-0xf083,0xf084-0xf085 irq 9 at device 20.0 on pci0 mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.0.0 battery0: ACPI Control Method Battery on acpi0 acpi_acad0: AC Adapter on acpi0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: PS/2 Mouse irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 attimer0: AT timer port 0x40-0x43,0x50-0x53 on acpi0 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 0xc-0xc8fff,0xe2000-0xe2fff pnpid ORM on isa0 sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 atrtc0: AT realtime clock at port 0x70 irq 8 on isa0 Event timer RTC frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 ppc0: parallel port not found. Timecounter TSC frequency 2171848610 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ad0: 16384MB VBOX HARDDISK 1.0 at ata0-master UDMA33 ugen0.1: Apple at usbus0 uhub0: Apple OHCI root HUB, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 on usbus0 ugen1.1: Intel at usbus1 uhub1: Intel EHCI root HUB, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 on usbus1 uhub0: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered uhub1: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered da0 at mpt0
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) ggg_m...@inbox.ru: I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth mentioning. Here are the steps I made: 1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD) 2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note that I haven't used SVN repository] 3. Applied the patch in question. 4. Created a zpool raidz of two disks of old version 15. Also some usual tuning of ZFS in loader.conf was done as I am running 32 bit version with low amount of memory. zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf was added too. 4.1 Moved /usr/ports to ZFS to have some files on it. 5. Make buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld - all the canonical steps from the Handbook. 6. After reboot to final 9.0-CURRENT world I got a dmesg with some trace stack related to ZFS and also a rc.d script message about unrecognized command 'volinit' (see the text of it in attachment). Did you run mergemaster correctly ? 7. Nevertheless the system booted. Files 8. `zpool upgrade -a` worked all right and reported that now I have ZFS version 28 Overall I am pleasantly surprised how streamlined the whole process was. I am going to perform more tourturing of this VM later as well. Thanks for your work! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!: # cd /usr/src # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # bzip2 -d zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # patch -E -p0 zfs_20101212.patch $ zfs allow Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/zfs/pyzfs.py, line 35, in module import zfs.util File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zfs/util.py, line 31, in module import solaris.misc ImportError: No module named solaris.misc Exit 1 Am I missing smth? Looks like lib/pysolaris wasn't ported from onnv-gate. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: $ zfs allow Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/zfs/pyzfs.py, line 35, in module import zfs.util File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zfs/util.py, line 31, in module import solaris.misc ImportError: No module named solaris.misc Exit 1 Am I missing smth? Looks like lib/pysolaris wasn't ported from onnv-gate. Doh, it's likely my install is broken, I think it worked before with previous ZFSv28 patch. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
I've installed and complied it on 9-Current 2010.12.12, looks to be running fine. I've imported a v15 6 disk raidz that was created under 8.1-Stable, and so far it's passing all tests. I'll be doing some serious Send/Receive testing in the next few days, so I'll see if I can break it. I'll also be upgrading the v15 fs to v28 and testing it further, as well as creating a fresh v28 pool, so I'll let you know how it goes. -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Pawel Jakub Dawidek Sent: December-14-10 11:44 AM To: Olivier Smedts Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Steven Hartland; m...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follow FreeBSD common upgrade path. Martin was working on this (CCed). -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks! Only strange thing is the rc script complains: /etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: zvol_start unrecognized command 'volinit' usage: zfs command args ... ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks! Only strange thing is the rc script complains: /etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: zvol_start unrecognized command 'volinit' usage: zfs command args ... Did you run mergemaster(8) after the upgrade? The patch includes change to etc/rc.d/zvol to remove 'zfs volinit'/'zfs volfini' which are no longer available. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgp7c4gzudIbP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!: # cd /usr/src # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # bzip2 -d zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # patch -E -p0 zfs_20101212.patch The patch is against FreeBSD HEAD as of 2010-12-12. Is it Christmas already ? Thanks ! :) Some of the changes since the last patchset (zfs_20100831.patch): - Boot support for ZFS v28 (only RAIDZ3 is not yet supported). - Various fixes for the existing ZFS boot code. - Support for sendfile(2) (by avg@). - Userland-kernel compatibility with v13-v15 (by mm@). I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no debugging) or make.conf. buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel INSTKERNNAME=CURRENT and rebooted in single-user mode with kernel=CURRENT. No problem so far, the kernel displayed the good freebsd/zpool/zfs version numbers, and it booted correctly in single-user mode. But I had problems with userland v15 : # mount tank/freebsd on / (zfs, local, noatime, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) # zpool status Assertion failed: (nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_STATS, (uint64_t **)vs, vsc) == 0), file /usr/src/cddl/lib/libzfs/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_status.c, line 181. pid 20 (zpool), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Abort trap Am I missing something ? - ACL fixes (by trasz@). - Various bug fixes. Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running v28 or boot from your existing pools. Enjoy! PS. Martin (mm@) will be providing patch against 8-STABLE soon. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! Cheers -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
- Original Message - From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no debugging) or make.conf. buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel INSTKERNNAME=CURRENT and rebooted in single-user mode with kernel=CURRENT. No problem so far, the kernel displayed the good freebsd/zpool/zfs version numbers, and it booted correctly in single-user mode. But I had problems with userland v15 : # mount tank/freebsd on / (zfs, local, noatime, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) # zpool status Assertion failed: (nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_STATS, (uint64_t **)vs, vsc) == 0), file /usr/src/cddl/lib/libzfs/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_status.c, line 181. pid 20 (zpool), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Abort trap Am I missing something ? build and install world? cd /usr/src make buildworld make installworld Regards Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/14 Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk: - Original Message - From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no debugging) or make.conf. buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel INSTKERNNAME=CURRENT and rebooted in single-user mode with kernel=CURRENT. No problem so far, the kernel displayed the good freebsd/zpool/zfs version numbers, and it booted correctly in single-user mode. But I had problems with userland v15 : # mount tank/freebsd on / (zfs, local, noatime, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) # zpool status Assertion failed: (nvlist_lookup_uint64_array(nvroot, ZPOOL_CONFIG_STATS, (uint64_t **)vs, vsc) == 0), file /usr/src/cddl/lib/libzfs/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_status.c, line 181. pid 20 (zpool), uid 0: exited on signal 6 Abort trap Am I missing something ? build and install world? cd /usr/src make buildworld Already done, before buildkernel as usual. make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? - Userland-kernel compatibility with v13-v15 (by mm@). Regards Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk. -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
- Original Message - From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? Not if you have just upgrade from 8-STABLE to Current. Regards Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follow FreeBSD common upgrade path. Martin was working on this (CCed). -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpCsgsK8Mp9u.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follow FreeBSD common upgrade path. Martin was working on this (CCed). Ok, glad to hear that. FYI, with the patched 9-CURRENT kernel in single user mode and the 8-STABLE world, I could zfs list, zfs list -t snapshot, zfs mount -a and zfs unmount -a ; those zfs commands worked properly. I only had problems with the zpool command (see previous mails for the error message). It was not necessary for the upgrade path, and I was able to make installworld, but I first wanted to see if the pool reported problems. With the 9-CURRENT world, all is working properly since 2 hours. Desktop/workstation use on an Intel 8-core (4 real with HTT), 4GB RAM, ATI RadeonHD. KDE with compositing, firefox and thunderbird are running fine. No ZFS debug messages except mount_snapshot. I left the few 8-STABLE old libraries, and did not upgrade the pool or the filesystems. Don't want to try that on a production desktop machine until it's safer :) Cheers -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Thanks for the notice. I have found the cause of this error (wrong constants), tested the code in both directions again (v15-v28 and v28-v15) + fixed it in perforce. Bugfix patch (apply after pjd's patch): http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfs_ioctl_compat.c.patch Dňa 14.12.2010 16:44, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote / napísal(a): On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: make installworld That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28 kernel ? Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follow FreeBSD common upgrade path. Martin was working on this (CCed). ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!: # cd /usr/src # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # bzip2 -d zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # patch -E -p0 zfs_20101212.patch The patch is against FreeBSD HEAD as of 2010-12-12. Some of the changes since the last patchset (zfs_20100831.patch): - Boot support for ZFS v28 (only RAIDZ3 is not yet supported). - Various fixes for the existing ZFS boot code. - Support for sendfile(2) (by avg@). - Userland-kernel compatibility with v13-v15 (by mm@). - ACL fixes (by trasz@). - Various bug fixes. Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15) when running v28 or boot from your existing pools. Enjoy! PS. Martin (mm@) will be providing patch against 8-STABLE soon. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgptzjMdmsjno.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!: # cd /usr/src # fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # bzip2 -d zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 # patch -E -p0 zfs_20101212.patch [...] If patch(1) reports reject of sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h file or you see the following error while compiling world: /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt/strtab.c:249: undefined reference to `MIN' strtab.o(.text+0x28d): In function `strtab_insert': /usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt/strtab.c:119: undefined reference to `MIN' strtab.o(.text+0x3a1):/usr/src/cddl/usr.bin/ctfconvert/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt/strtab.c:145: undefined reference to `MIN' *** Error code 1 Simple remove sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h file from the tree. Unfortunately the patch can either works on source downloaded via cvsup or on the source downloaded via subversion as those two have different $FreeBSD$ id strings (at least in case of this file). The patch is generated based on subversion source, so if you use cvsup, you most likely will see the reject and the error. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgp46myIfopSX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: Hi. The new patchset is ready for testing: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2 You can also download the whole source tree already patched from here: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/zfs_20101212.tbz -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! pgpJ41aQDwAYd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:00:31PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
What's the expected behaviour for the sendfile changes as
sendfile is one of the problems we have here with the
double memory allocation required for it under ZFS compared
to UFS. Does this patch address that?
No. The patch doesn't address that. It only adds support for
sendfile(2), as it was commented out in the previous patchset.
Inspecting the patch the following segment looks odd:-
--- sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c.orig
+++ sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
...
while (n 0) {
nbytes = MIN(n, zfs_read_chunk_size -
P2PHASE(uio-uio_loffset, zfs_read_chunk_size));
+#ifdef __FreeBSD__
+ if (uio-uio_segflg == UIO_NOCOPY)
+ error = mappedread_sf(vp, nbytes, uio);
+ else
+#endif /* __FreeBSD__ */
if (vn_has_cached_data(vp))
error = mappedread(vp, nbytes, uio);
else
Is there an extra else in there which will break things or should
the __FreeBSD__ mappedread_sf block replace the standard mappedread
call or is the indentation just a bit weird?
The code is correct. It is just hard to split 'else' and 'if' with a
'#endif' and keep the indentation pretty. Depends on the conditions we
use one of the three methods to read the data.
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com
p...@freebsd.org http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
pgpSKGrAP0AYX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
