Hi Kostik,
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, 13:56+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, 22:21+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > > Fixed patch is available at
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
> > >
> > Works as expected without any glitches.
> >
> I unders
Hi Kostik,
I understand that you are busy with the release. But is there a plan
to commit this code somewhere in the near future?
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, 22:21+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> [...]
> > Fixed patch is available at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
> >
> W
[...]
> Fixed patch is available at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
>
Works as expected without any glitches.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-c
[...]
> Overall, the test is quite curious but absolutely unrealistic.
If there is a realistic one I'm open to use it :-)
> Fixed patch is available at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/map_datalimit.2.patch
>
OK, will test and report the results shortly.
--
Maxim Konovalov
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:38:19PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Kostik,
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, 11:22+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > > Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
> > >
> > [igor's email was corrected]
> >
> > We will test it in out environm
Hi Kostik,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, 11:22+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> [...]
> > Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
> >
> [igor's email was corrected]
>
> We will test it in out environment and let you know.
>
It seems I don't understand how it works.
Here is a test pro
[...]
> Anyway, the patch needs testers before I will push it forward.
>
[igor's email was corrected]
We will test it in out environment and let you know.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
Hello!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
> The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
> of sbrk() for pages allocation, and thus RLIMIT_DATA limit is no longer
> ef
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 07:43:57PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
> > The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
> >
I was reminded about the patch I wrote for Igor Sysoev some time ago.
The issue the patch tries to handle is that jemalloc uses mmap() instead
of sbrk() for pages allocation, and thus RLIMIT_DATA limit is no longer
effective to put the bounds on the process heap. Since reverting to sbrk
for such pu
10 matches
Mail list logo