Joerg Wunsch wrote:
Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the code a bit more closely and you're entirely right. I
think I figured out why my patch caused a core dump. Here is a more
correct patch that should fix the problem without causing core dumps.
Seems to work.
As Maxime Henrion wrote:
Seems to work. mount(8) has still the problem though:
Great, I'll file a PR for it. Thanks for the feedback !
I can commit it if you want.
I fail to see why should ``mount -t local'' work.
ISTR that it used to work, at least in the context of
mount -a -t
In local.freebsd.current you write:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
If my patch is exact, then the bug should manifest itself only if there
are no network filesystems mounted. Do you have any network fs mounted
on your box ?
No networked filesystems here, and
Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote:
In local.freebsd.current you write:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
If my patch is exact, then the bug should manifest itself only if there
are no network filesystems mounted. Do you have any network fs mounted
on your box ?
No
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Maxime Henrion wrote:
Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote:
[...]
They don't have to be mounted, just loaded. E.g. if nfs
shows up with lsvfs, df -l will work, if not, it won't.
(dunno about other network file systems).
[...]
I looked at the code a bit more closely and you're
Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked at the code a bit more closely and you're entirely right. I
think I figured out why my patch caused a core dump. Here is a more
correct patch that should fix the problem without causing core dumps.
Seems to work. mount(8) has still the
In my dual Pentium3/1GHz box:
% uname -a
FreeBSD mako.kobe1995.net 5.0-CURRENT-20010830-JPSNAP FreeBSD
5.0-CURRENT-20010830-JPSNAP #9: Sat Nov 3 17:05:25 JST 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KOBE5SMP i386
% df -l
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
Paul van der Zwan wrote:
I noticed the -l option of the df command is broken. It is supposed to
print df for local filesystems but on my system it prints nothing at all.
I had a quick look at the code , as far as I can tell it uses sysctl to
figure out the mounted filesystems but
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:41:01 +0100
From: Paul van der Zwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed the -l option of the df command is broken
That differs from my experience:
d141[1] df -l
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s3a158783939195216264%
Paul van der Zwan wrote:
I noticed the -l option of the df command is broken. It is supposed to
print df for local filesystems but on my system it prints nothing at all.
I had a quick look at the code , as far as I can tell it uses sysctl to
figure out the mounted filesystems but thinks
David Wolfskill wrote:
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:41:01 +0100
From: Paul van der Zwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed the -l option of the df command is broken
That differs from my experience:
d141[1] df -l
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s3a
11 matches
Mail list logo
