Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Maxime Henrion
Jake Burkholder wrote: Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Maxime Henrion said words to the effect of; Morten Rodal wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Luis M. Zuccolo
Hello, I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. On Wednesday 26 February 2003 08:01, Maxime Henrion wrote: Jake Burkholder wrote: Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Mezz bsdforums.org
I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. % tar xfvz NVIDIA_FreeBSD-1.0-3203.tar.gz % fetch http://mu.org/~mux/patches/nvidia.patch % patch -p0 nvidia.patch % cd

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Luis M. Zuccolo
Thanks Mess On Thursday 27 February 2003 02:55, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. % tar xfvz NVIDIA_FreeBSD-1.0-3203.tar.gz % fetch

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread walt
Maxime Henrion wrote: --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, Recent interface changes made the nVidia driver unbuildable on -CURRENT. The attached patch should make it work as it used to. Please let me know if it doesn't. Yes!

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Morten Rodal
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@ SLIST_FOREACH(at, sc-alloc_list, list) { if (offset = at-address offset at-address + at-size) -return atop(vtophys(offset)); +

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Maxime Henrion
Morten Rodal wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@ SLIST_FOREACH(at, sc-alloc_list, list) { if (offset = at-address offset at-address + at-size) -return

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Patrick Hartling
Does anyone have this working with GDM 2.4.1.3 on -current? I've found that I can use the nvidia driver with Maxime's patch on a freshly built -current system as long as I don't use GDM. If I start up GDM, the system freezes as soon as the nvidia logo is replaced by the GDM login screen. In

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 23:45, Patrick Hartling wrote: Does anyone have this working with GDM 2.4.1.3 on -current? I've found that I can use the nvidia driver with Maxime's patch on a freshly built -current system as long as I don't use GDM. If I start up GDM, the system freezes as soon as

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-25 Thread Jake Burkholder
Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Maxime Henrion said words to the effect of; Morten Rodal wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@ SLIST_FOREACH(at, sc-alloc_list, list) {