Re: SCSI-IDE

2001-11-13 Thread Stijn Hoop

Just curious, but how is the patch progressing? Can I try this out on
a -STABLE system somehow?

--Stijn

-- 
I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: SCSI-IDE

2001-11-13 Thread Thomas Quinot

Le 2001-11-13, Stijn Hoop écrivait :

 Just curious, but how is the patch progressing?

For the moment I am expecting feedback from the testers who have
reported problems booting with the patch (esp. on SMP machines).

 Can I try this out on a -STABLE system somehow?

Yes, the patch available from
  http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
is against -STABLE.

BTW, I have succesfully used it this week-end for playing DVDs with
xine and mplayer.

Thomas.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: SCSI-IDE

2001-11-13 Thread David Bushong

Though this is sure to invoke _you_ try it and tell _us_...   Anyone gotten
tosha to work with this?  Since cdd broke and dagrab is worthless quality-wise,
AFAICT, and the cdparanoia port to *BSD isn't done...  I'm left without a good
way to rip.

--David Bushong

On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote:
 Le 2001-11-13, Stijn Hoop écrivait :
 
  Just curious, but how is the patch progressing?
 
 For the moment I am expecting feedback from the testers who have
 reported problems booting with the patch (esp. on SMP machines).
 
  Can I try this out on a -STABLE system somehow?
 
 Yes, the patch available from
   http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
 is against -STABLE.
 
 BTW, I have succesfully used it this week-end for playing DVDs with
 xine and mplayer.
 
 Thomas.
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-scsi in the body of the message

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: SCSI-IDE

2001-11-08 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

How do you inform the upper layers that only 10+ byte commands are
allowed? (12 byte in the case of ATAPI).

In the long term, this would just be the nature of the exported
Protocol Type/Protocol Version and Transport Type/Transport Version
passed back in the Path Inquiry response.  The peripheral driver will
just know that for x protocol, only y commands are allowed.

These fields are in the CAM_NEW_TRAN_CODE in current.

--
Justin

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



SCSI-IDE

2001-11-04 Thread Jan Stocker

Is there any working thread for doing a SCSI-IDE translation like NetBSD and
LINUX has? This is very useful to get proggys like cdrecord (and the GUIs
[GnomeToaster]) running on IDE cd writers.

Jan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: SCSI-IDE

2001-11-04 Thread Scott Long

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:43:57PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:
 Is there any working thread for doing a SCSI-IDE translation like NetBSD and
 LINUX has? This is very useful to get proggys like cdrecord (and the GUIs
 [GnomeToaster]) running on IDE cd writers.

It would require that someone write an ATA SIM for CAM.  As yet, no one
has stepped forward to volunteer.

Scott

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message