Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:18:33 + Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote: On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets. Should this be simply ignored for build targets? build targets utilize install targets internally, so this is hardly doable. Could then this be documented in file /usr/src/tools/build/options/WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB, possibly the same way as in /usr/src/tools/build/options/WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN? It does not tell 'The option does not work for build targets' currently. Regards, Milan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? Regards, Milan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets. -- Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org FreeBSD committer ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets. Should this be simply ignored for build targets? -- Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org FreeBSD committer ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote: On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: Hi, I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf. Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here? This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets. Should this be simply ignored for build targets? build targets utilize install targets internally, so this is hardly doable. -- Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org FreeBSD committer ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On 17 June 2011 00:18, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
Hi,
I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified
for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs
at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and
http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this
time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf.
Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here?
This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like
WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets.
Should this be simply ignored for build targets?
build targets utilize install targets internally, so this is
hardly doable.
cd ${.CURDIR} make ${CURRENT_BUILD FLAGS} ${SUPPORTED_BUILD_FLAGS}
__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null SRC_CONF=/dev/null targets ?
-- Eir Nym
--
Ruslan Ermilov
r...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD committer
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB broken?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2011 00:18, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:09:05PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
On 16 June 2011 16:55, Ruslan Ermilov r...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
Hi,
I encountered an error when WITHOUT_INSTALLLIB option is specified
for 'make buildworld' process. I documented this issue with build logs
at my page, http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log1 and
http://www.dino.sk/build/2011-06-16-log2 show how to test this. At this
time, there is no /etc/make.conf nor /etc/src.conf.
Any idea what's wrong with libegacy.a here?
This option wasn't designed for build, only for install. It's like
WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN, which is documented to not work for build targets.
Should this be simply ignored for build targets?
build targets utilize install targets internally, so this is
hardly doable.
cd ${.CURDIR} make ${CURRENT_BUILD FLAGS} ${SUPPORTED_BUILD_FLAGS}
__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null SRC_CONF=/dev/null targets ?
Executing make targets presents all available value for ${TARGET},
not what many groups refer to as 'recipes', 'goals', or similar, e.g.
# 'b' is the source and 'a' is install target
a: b
install -m 0664 b a
Cheers,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
