Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-07 Thread Robert Huff
Doug Barton writes: > > /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for > > new volunteers > > If you don't have time to work on the port, then don't, that's > not a problem. But throwing a hissy fit here doesn't help at all. Cut tha man some slack. As far as

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/07/2012 08:19 Waitman Gobble said the following: > I can create and submit a port for libreoffice 3.6.0.0 if anyone is > interested in trying the "beta" version. Might take a few days. Still working > on it. We have mailing list off...@freebsd.org for people who are interested in openoffice,

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-04 Thread Waitman Gobble
Baptiste Daroussin wrote .. > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/04/2012 15:02, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > The thing, as I see it, is that people have to understand > this is a volunteer project and if people don't do things > by themselves they really can't demand someone else to > do it for them. Of course. But that's totally different from, "I don't use Fr

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-04 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Just IMHO; --- Mer 4/7/12, Doug Barton ha scritto: ... > >> > >> This is not what I expect from quality securing! It > >> is simply a mess and definitely another reason > >> and point for the thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD". > > > > sure libreoffice is so easy to port... > > > > /me officially gi

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-04 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/03/2012 11:34, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: >>> I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. >>> I have both gstreamer a

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64)

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-03 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 07/03/12 12:30, Chris Rees wrote: > On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." wrote: >> >> On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: >>> I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. >>> I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. >>> >> >> >> We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and Free

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-03 Thread Chris Rees
On Jul 3, 2012 10:00 AM, "Hartmann, O." wrote: > > On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > > > > > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). > > devel/boo

Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice:

2012-07-03 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 07/02/12 08:09, Sayetsky Anton wrote: > I will test libreoffice build on 8.3-RELEASE today or tomorrow. > I have both gstreamer and boost installed now. > We use FreeBSD 9.0STABLE and FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (both amd64). devel/boost-lib gets reeled in now by editors/libreoffice by default, so