On 29-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for?
On 26-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:15, John Baldwin wrote:
Well, here's the thing. If libgtop is intended to be used only with live
kernels then it might be a better idea to use xvnode's that you get with
from the kernel. Alternatively, you could grab the inode
John Baldwin wrote:
Yes. This means that you don't need to even look at v_tag to see
if it is a UFS vnode or not. What does libgtop want with
device and inode numbers anways? Does it actually do anything
useful with them or does it just print them somewhere? Is a user
going to care if the
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Yes. This means that you don't need to even look at v_tag to see
if it is a UFS vnode or not. What does libgtop want with
device and inode numbers anways? Does it actually do anything
useful with them or does it just print
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Yes. This means that you don't need to even look at v_tag to see
if it is a UFS vnode or not. What does libgtop want with
device and inode numbers anways? Does it actually do anything
useful with them or does it just print them
On 28-Oct-2002 Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Yes. This means that you don't need to even look at v_tag to see
if it is a UFS vnode or not. What does libgtop want with
device and inode numbers anways? Does it actually do anything
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
Terry is right. It needs to be the same inode number that is reported by
stat and getdirents. It's unfortunate that you can't do a getattr or stat
based on the address of the vnode. I have actually used and relied on this
behavior in the past.
On 28-Oct-2002 John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Yes. This means that you don't need to even look at v_tag to see
if it is a UFS vnode or not. What does libgtop want with
device and inode numbers anways? Does it actually do anything
useful with
John Baldwin wrote:
Sheesh,
does anyone actually _use_ libgtop against kernel core dumps?
If not then it shouldn't be groveling around in the kernel
fondling implementation details. Instead, it should be using
stat(2), or at the worst using a sysctl to get xvnode structures.
As an
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that display load averages and other silly system
monitor stuff in small spaces in GUI's. It seems to work quite
happily w/o any inode numbers or dev_t's for non-UFS filesystems.
I just don't
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that display load averages and other silly system
monitor stuff in small spaces in GUI's. It seems to work quite
happily w/o any inode numbers or dev_t's
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that display load averages and other silly system
monitor stuff in small spaces in GUI's. It seems to
On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that display load averages and other silly system
monitor
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
You're probably right. But without waiting to re-architect libgtop, I
think the immediate problem needs to be fixed. Shall I just commit my
original patch that uses libkvm?
Use v_cachedid and v_cachedfs
John Baldwin wrote:
To build little applets that activate a flashing red light when
certain files are written?
Why do you need the inode number to do that. Just kqueue on the
file itself using a regular fd, and in that case you can stat(2)
the file if you really need the i-node number.
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On 28-Oct-2002 Terry Lambert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
I mean, do you know what libgtop is used for? It's used to draw
little applets that
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:15, John Baldwin wrote:
Well, here's the thing. If libgtop is intended to be used only with live
kernels then it might be a better idea to use xvnode's that you get with
from the kernel. Alternatively, you could grab the inode and dev number
the same way the sysctl
On 24 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
I committed my patch to libgtop and libgtop2 a while ago. It should
work on both -CURRENT, not so -CURRENT, and -stable. Checkout patch-ah
in libgtop/files. Works like a champ on -CURRENT from Monday.
Thanks for taking care of that.
-Nate
To
On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current?
This is the patch I used to get it building the other day:
cat
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
It does?! v_tag is a pointer to kernel memory, you can't read that
from userland! You would get a SIGSEGV and die as soon as you do the
'strcmp()'. That's why I #ifdef'd the whole chunk out. Also,
On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current?
This
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current?
This is the patch I used to get it building the other day:
cat patch-sysdeps_freebsd_procmap.c
--- sysdeps/freebsd/procmap.c.orig Tue Oct 15 20:00:35 2002
+++
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current?
This is the patch I used to get it building the other day:
cat patch-sysdeps_freebsd_procmap.c
--- sysdeps/freebsd/procmap.c.orig
24 matches
Mail list logo
