On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
wrote:
According to Ollivier Robert:
You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the code one.
FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a
prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've
Outback Dingo wrote this message on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 19:01 -0400:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
wrote:
According to Ollivier Robert:
You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the code one.
FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839
According to Ollivier Robert:
You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the code one.
FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a
prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re@ whether they would consider
this for 9.2. It is very late in the 9.2 release
According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
changes improve the performance over 10x in my tests (from ~150MB/sec to
over 2GB
On 8/23/2013 11:16 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
changes improve the performance
Ollivier Robert wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 17:16 +0200:
According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage
Mike Tancsa wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:26 -0400:
On 8/23/2013 11:16 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to John-Mark Gurney on Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:20:27PM -0700:
I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
AES-XTS algorithm into userland
On 8/23/2013 2:05 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Speeding up userland AES is very interesting to me for a couple of apps.
If there is a proper way I should test on RELENG_9, please let me know
as I am few boxes that I would be happy to test/deploy on.
My patch would only effect userland
According to John-Mark Gurney:
pjd did not merge (as he said at the time of commit) r226839 r226839. Is
there any objection to merge these two (and possibly 247061 as well --
copyright update)?
You repeated r226839 twice. What is the correct second revision?
You are right, I wanted to say
Mike Tancsa wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 14:19 -0400:
On 8/23/2013 2:05 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Speeding up userland AES is very interesting to me for a couple of apps.
If there is a proper way I should test on RELENG_9, please let me know
as I am few boxes that I would
John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com writes:
Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net writes:
John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com writes:
My patch would only effect userland applications that use /dev/crypto...
For me its ssh which I think does, no ?
It looks like it uses OpenSSL for it's crypto, not
Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote this message on Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 21:30 +0200:
John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com writes:
Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net writes:
John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com writes:
My patch would only effect userland applications that use /dev/crypto...
For me its ssh
I have developed a patch to improve AES-NI performance. If you took the
AES-XTS algorithm into userland (no cryptodev or geli usage), these
changes improve the performance over 10x in my tests (from ~150MB/sec to
over 2GB/sec). In tests of geli on gnop, the performance improvement is
more
13 matches
Mail list logo
