Re: st_dev and st_ino for pipes

2011-10-05 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 6:04:05 pm Kostik Belousov wrote: > Our implementation of pipes does not provide useful values for st_dev > and st_ino when stat(2) is done on an anonymous pipe. It was noted by the > people outside the project, e.g. Perl contains a workaround in one > of its modules, su

Re: st_dev and st_ino for pipes

2011-10-04 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 05:37:27PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Oct-03 01:04:05 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >Our implementation of pipes does not provide useful values for st_dev > >and st_ino when stat(2) is done on an anonymous pipe. It was noted by the > ... > >Patch below implement

Re: st_dev and st_ino for pipes

2011-10-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Oct-03 01:04:05 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: >Our implementation of pipes does not provide useful values for st_dev >and st_ino when stat(2) is done on an anonymous pipe. It was noted by the ... >Patch below implements the requirement, by the cost of the small overhead >at the pipe creati

st_dev and st_ino for pipes

2011-10-02 Thread Kostik Belousov
Our implementation of pipes does not provide useful values for st_dev and st_ino when stat(2) is done on an anonymous pipe. It was noted by the people outside the project, e.g. Perl contains a workaround in one of its modules, submitted by Debian/kFreeBSD developers, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-