On 27 Dec 2017, at 16:39, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 16/12/17 2:39 am, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Put the following into /etc/src.conf:
>
> This brings up two questions:
> when to use make.conf and when to use src.conf,
make.conf is for building everything, so ports, or your own programs.
On 16/12/17 2:39 am, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Put the following into /etc/src.conf:
This brings up two questions:
when to use make.conf and when to use src.conf,
and..
WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes
WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=yes
WITHOUT_TESTS=yes
which of the following is correct and why?
WITH_DEBUG_FI
On 15 December 2017 at 20:20, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> On 15 December 2017 at 19:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:38:48PM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>>> On 15 December 2017 at 17:51, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>>> > On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill
On 15 December 2017 at 20:41, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 12/15/17, 1:28 PM, "owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org"
> wrote:
>
>
> Wolfram Schneider writes:
>
> > I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> > is now 11GB huge:
> >
> > FreeBSD 12-curr
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:12:09 +0100 "Wolfram Schneider" said
Hi,
I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
is now 11GB huge:
FreeBSD 12-current
$ du -hs /usr/obj
11G /usr/obj
on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
$ du -hs /usr/obj
5.6G /usr/obj
FWIW on a fres
>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>> is now 11GB huge:
>>
[snip]
>
> There was a change near the beginning of November; please see UPDATING
> entry 20171101 -- you probably have several no-longer-used
> subdirectories under /usr/obj/usr/src/.
>
> Once tho
On 12/15/17, 1:28 PM, "owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org"
wrote:
Wolfram Schneider writes:
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-current
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 11G /usr/obj
>
Wolfram Schneider writes:
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-current
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 11G /usr/obj
>
> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 5.6G /usr/obj
Mine - also 12-cu
On 15 December 2017 at 19:39, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:38:48PM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> On 15 December 2017 at 17:51, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> > On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfra
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:38:48PM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> On 15 December 2017 at 17:51, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> > On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I upgraded a machine f
On 15 December 2017 at 17:51, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>>> is now 11GB huge:
>>>
>>> Fr
On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
>> is now 11GB huge:
>>
>> FreeBSD 12-current
>> $ du -hs /usr/obj
>> 11G /usr/obj
>>
>> on F
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
> is now 11GB huge:
>
> FreeBSD 12-current
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 11G /usr/obj
>
> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
> $ du -hs /usr/obj
> 5.
Hi,
I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree
is now 11GB huge:
FreeBSD 12-current
$ du -hs /usr/obj
11G /usr/obj
on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size:
$ du -hs /usr/obj
5.6G /usr/obj
this is a problem when you have a small VM with 20GB disk space or less.
Is t
14 matches
Mail list logo
