* De: Mark Kettenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-10-17 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: [PATCH] Fix PT_IO ptrace(2) request ]
>Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On 14-Oct-2002 Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> T
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 14-Oct-2002 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The new PT_IO ptrace(2) request doesn't work, since it doesn't release
> a lock. Since PT_IO is similar to PT_READ_D/PT_WRITE_D, I copied the
> PROC_UNLOCK fr
On 14-Oct-2002 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The new PT_IO ptrace(2) request doesn't work, since it doesn't release
> a lock. Since PT_IO is similar to PT_READ_D/PT_WRITE_D, I copied the
> PROC_UNLOCK from there and inserted in the same location. Patch,
> against version 1.103 of sys_process.c, attach
The new PT_IO ptrace(2) request doesn't work, since it doesn't release
a lock. Since PT_IO is similar to PT_READ_D/PT_WRITE_D, I copied the
PROC_UNLOCK from there and inserted in the same location. Patch,
against version 1.103 of sys_process.c, attached.
This patch is also available as:
htt