On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:52 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>> / On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> />>>/ I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
> />>/ />>/ I've waited a while to see what other opinions wo
On Monday 22 March 2010 4:48:19 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:52 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
> >
> > I've waited a while to see what other opinions would
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:52 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
/ On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
/>>>/ I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
/>>/
/>>/ I've waited a while to see what other opinions would be expressed on this
/>>/ topic. I believe there is suffici
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:52 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
>
> I've waited a while to see what other opinions would be expressed on this
> topic. I believe there is sufficient support to
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:00:18AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I certainly agree.. can it be changed please?
I've waited a while to see what other opinions would be expressed on this
topic. I believe there is sufficient support to rename COMPAT_FREEBSD32
to something else based on responses i