Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Peter Wemm
"=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" wrote: > Guys; > > I have to agree with Terry that the fixes for netns > should be committed, and furthermore they should be > MFC (using his first patch perhaps). It's a nightmare > to try to rescue anything from the Attic, at least it > would be nice to ha

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Guys; I have to agree with Terry that the fixes for netns should be committed, and furthermore they should be MFC (using his first patch perhaps). It's a nightmare to try to rescue anything from the Attic, at least it would be nice to have it in better shape before killing it. The flame fest on r

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Terry Lambert
Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:24:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > For heaven's sake! *It has only been 3 days* since the code > > was threatened! What do you expect *in 3 days*!?! > > > > The code has been broken for 7 years. You've > had ample time to fix and *maintain* t

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:24:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > For heaven's sake! *It has only been 3 days* since the code > was threatened! What do you expect *in 3 days*!?! > The code has been broken for 7 years. You've had ample time to fix and *maintain* this code. Points moot, anywa

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Terry Lambert
David O'Brien wrote: > > Here is a single patch vs. 5.x. > > > > I believe this makes it actually work. >^ >huh? This is untested? Will you accept interoperability between two FreeBSD boxes? A FreeBSD box and a NetBSD box? > > Please apply this to the code, even if you are inte

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:03:49AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > > Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Here are two patches. The first fixes missing pieces in /sys/conf/files > > > and /sys/conf/options, the second fixes all the files that need it in > > > /sys/netns/. > > > > You seem

Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns

2003-03-05 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Wemm wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > Here are two patches. The first fixes missing pieces in /sys/conf/files > > and /sys/conf/options, the second fixes all the files that need it in > > /sys/netns/. > > You seem to have posted the wrong patch. > > This is against 4.x, not -current, and