Rick Macklem wrote this message on Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 16:10 -0400:
> I tried:
> m = m_getjcl(M_NOWAIT..M_JUMPAGESIZE);
> if (m == NULL)
>m = getjcl(M_WAITOK..MCLBYTES);
> when I was experimenting with MJUMPAGESIZE clusters for NFS and what happened
> was the thread looped
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:12
> +0200:
> > I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
> > existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The
> > background
> > for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would it be better if my patch used the PAGE_SIZE clusters instead
> > of
> > the 16K ones? Then it should not be affected by memory
> > defragmentation.
> > Thanks for shedding some light into this area?
> >
Well, I ran into the threads stuck on "btal
Hi,
Would it be better if my patch used the PAGE_SIZE clusters instead of
the 16K ones? Then it should not be affected by memory defragmentation.
Thanks for shedding some light into this area?
--HPS
Hi,
Updated patch attached.
--HPS
=== sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c
On 07/08/14 04:14, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:12:07AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background
for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag l
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:12:07AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
> existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background
> for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag long mbuf chains that
> doesn't
Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:12 +0200:
> I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
> existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background
> for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag long mbuf chains that
> doesn't fi
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
> existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background
> for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag long mbuf chains that
> doesn't fit into a specific hardware's scatter gather
Hi,
I'm asking for some input on the attached m_dup() patch, so that
existing functionality or dependencies are not broken. The background
for the change is to allow m_dup() to defrag long mbuf chains that
doesn't fit into a specific hardware's scatter gather entries, typically
when doing TSO
