On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 03-Jul-2003 Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if
possible) sysctls...
I'm still not sure why we have both mechanisms. Perhaps a useful approach
would
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 03-Jul-2003 Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if
possible) sysctls...
I'm still not sure why we have both mechanisms. Perhaps a useful
On 03-Jul-2003 Florian Smeets wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 03-Jul-2003 Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if
possible) sysctls...
I'm still not sure why we have
