On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:51:25AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:16:35PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
repo-surgery there, removed some
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Huh?! Read the first posting in this thread. I suggest that you do
forced commits to contrib/gcc/config/i386/*.h (probably other arches
too) that were surgered.
I already did 2 forced committs. See some of Peter's email on the
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:21:25AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Huh?! Read the first posting in this thread. I suggest that you do
forced commits to contrib/gcc/config/i386/*.h (probably other arches
too) that were surgered.
Should one be able to do a source upgrade from an old -current (March 10)
to the latest? I have been trying, but it breaks in the cross tools
section in gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int. mkdep fails. There are a lot of warnings
that looks like this:
#
I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
repo-surgery there, removed some revisions, and later replaced
them with the new stuff (well, new stuff took the same revisions),
and now some of your checked out
Yup, you are right, thanks. I remember about the problem, but did not
remember the symptoms of it, so didn't put two and two together. :-(
I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
repo-surgery there,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:16:35PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
repo-surgery there, removed some revisions, and later replaced
them with the new stuff (well, new
