Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp]

2011-11-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
- message from Garrett Cooper - > > I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I > > created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h': > > > > # cat freebsd10.h > > #include "freebsd9.h" > > #define freebsd8 freebsd8 > > > > +Cc: maintainer > > You'll need to do more than

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp

2011-11-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió: > >> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r >> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; >> or you can use WI

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp

2011-11-03 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió: > No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r > and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; > or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE > (which