Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-07-02 Thread Scott Reese
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 19:36, Jud wrote: [snip] I have two physical drives (ad0, ad1). XP is on ad0 (the first drive) and FreeBSD is on ad1 (the second drive). I have been using booteasy on the *first* drive with a regular mbr on the second and that worked just fine until I did a fresh

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-07-01 Thread Scott Reese
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 01:34, Jud wrote: to boot FreeBSD with no problems at all, but when I went to boot up Windows, I received the dreaded 'NTLDR missing' message. [grub stuff snipped] A few comments about the thread so far: ISTM the easiest thing for you to do is install booteasy

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-07-01 Thread Jud
On 01 Jul 2003 18:12:20 +, Scott Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 01:34, Jud wrote: to boot FreeBSD with no problems at all, but when I went to boot up Windows, I received the dreaded 'NTLDR missing' message. [grub stuff snipped] A few comments about the thread so

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Jud
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:34:36 +0100, Andrew Boothman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 11:36 pm, Scott Reese wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Craig Boston
On Monday 30 June 2003 08:34 pm, Jud wrote: I think Jesse Guardini's suggestion works when Win and FreeBSD are on the same drive. You can still use the NT/2K/XP bootloader when the OSs are on different drives, but problem is, I could never figure out exactly what the FAQ was trying to tell me

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Boothman
On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no problem booting into either Windows or FreeBSD. However, I found myself having to reinstall FreeBSD so I decided to go

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Doug White
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Boothman wrote: This seems to be a recurring problem after 5-RELEASE. I had exactly the same problem, and I know of others that are the same. For some reason -current doesn't seem to be inter-operating well with the WinXP/Win2k loader anymore. I'm not sure if it's

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Reese
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:14, Doug White wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Boothman wrote: This seems to be a recurring problem after 5-RELEASE. I had exactly the same problem, and I know of others that are the same. For some reason -current doesn't seem to be inter-operating well with

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Scott Reese
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no problem booting into either Windows or FreeBSD. However, I

Re: 5.1-RELEASE Windows XP dual-boot issues

2003-06-30 Thread Andrew Boothman
On Monday 30 June 2003 11:36 pm, Scott Reese wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 22:10, Andrew Boothman wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 7:19 pm, Scott Reese wrote: Previously, I had a dual-boot setup with FreeBSD 5.0 and Windows XP. I was using booteasy as the boot loader and I had no problem