Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Jun Sue
I tested it in my laptop. Everything works however just as the previous version. I didn't see any bug in my machine fixed. Anyway I think it is worth to check in. Jun Su _ Do You Yahoo!? 更多惊喜,同样精彩,NetVista A30 热卖 http://ad.cn.doubleclick.ne

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Do you have "option MAXMEM" set in your kernel config file? No. --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Takanori Watanabe wrote: > Would you try it? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff > http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz Just did here, ASUS P4S8X board, With the CVS version power off doesnt work, it prints the "power system off usi

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe
Would you try it? http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz The OSD interface of void AcpiOsDerivePciId(ACPI_HANDLE Rhandle, ACPI_HANDLE Lhandle, ACPI_PCI_ID **Id) is not impremented yet. (Only Do

Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gr over, Andrew" wrote: >> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp> >i/downloads/CHANGES.txt >> >> I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from >> iwasaki@ Iwasaki seems to be busy no

RE: [acpi-jp 2105] Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Grover, Andrew
> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp> i/downloads/CHANGES.txt > > I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from > iwasaki@ Another release is imminent. Or, if you decide to go with what's out there now there is on

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Nate Lawson
I wrote: > > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there > > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. > > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for > > testing? If enough people indicate there are no problems, it w

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:58:20AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there > > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. > > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for > >

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there > are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. > Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for > testing? If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be >

Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:34:26PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are > a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. Could > someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for > testing? If enoug

ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-19 Thread Nate Lawson
It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for testing? If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be nice to have an