Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Takanori Watanabe wrote:
 Would you try it?
 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff
 http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz

Just did here, ASUS P4S8X board, 

With the CVS version power off doesnt work, it prints the 
power system off using ACPI waits a couble seconds, prints
that the ACPI poweroff function timed out and reboots :(

With the above applied it is even worse, it prints the
power system off using ACPI and then hangs the system
without powering off :( :(

Besides this both seems to work, except they both find
dual CPU's which I dont have :)

-Søren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello,

 Do you have option MAXMEM set in your kernel config file?
No.

--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-21 Thread Jun Sue
I tested it in my laptop. Everything works however
just as the previous version. I didn't see any bug in
my machine fixed. Anyway I think it is worth to check
in.

Jun Su

_
Do You Yahoo!? 
NetVista A30 
http://ad.cn.doubleclick.net/clk;5313999;7930402;p?http://www.ibm.com/cn/promotion/pc/netvista_a30/index.shtml

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:34:26PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
 It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are
 a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.  Could
 someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
 testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
 nice to have an import before 5.1R
 
 http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt
 
Yes, very much please.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov  Sysadmin and DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello,

 It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there
 are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.
 Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
 testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
 nice to have an import before 5.1R
 http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt
I can -at least- report one problem with the current ACPI code. When
loaded, the kernel freezes right after
APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery

When I unset the acpi_load variable (so I don't load ACPI) it works.

I'm glad to test any patches.

--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
cell.: +3630 306 6758

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:58:20AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
 Hello,
 
  It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there
  are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.
  Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
  testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
  nice to have an import before 5.1R
  http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt
 I can -at least- report one problem with the current ACPI code. When
 loaded, the kernel freezes right after
 APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery
 
 When I unset the acpi_load variable (so I don't load ACPI) it works.
 

Do you have option MAXMEM set in your kernel config
file?  I had a similar problem and discovered that
the MAXMEM setting and acpi's idea of the memory in the
system were slightly different.  The is on the order
of 1 kB.

-- 
Steve

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Nate Lawson
I wrote:
  It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there
  are a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.
  Could someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
  testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
  nice to have an import before 5.1R
  http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt

I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
iwasaki@

-Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


RE: [acpi-jp 2105] Re: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Grover, Andrew
 From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp
i/downloads/CHANGES.txt
 
 I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
 iwasaki@

Another release is imminent. Or, if you decide to go with what's out
there now there is one little patch that would be good to have, if you
aren't going to import again for a while.

This is against the Linuxized version but you should be able to get the
gist of it:

--- 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c.orig  Wed Mar  5
17:00:15 2003
+++ 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c   Wed Mar  5
17:01:30 2003
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
/* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number for this GPE block */
 
if ((gpe_number  gpe_block-block_base_number) ||
-   (gpe_number = (gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {
+   (gpe_number - gpe_block-block_base_number =
(gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {


Regards -- Andy

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gr
over, Andrew wrote:
 From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acp
i/downloads/CHANGES.txt
 
 I'll try to generate a diff soon at post it since I haven't heard from
 iwasaki@

Iwasaki seems to be busy now.

This is against the Linuxized version but you should be able to get the
gist of it:

--- 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c.orig Wed Mar  5
17:00:15 2003
+++ 2421-pre4-acpi/drivers/acpi/events/evgpeblk.c  Wed Mar  5
17:01:30 2003
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
   /* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number for this GPE block */
 
   if ((gpe_number  gpe_block-block_base_number) ||
-  (gpe_number = (gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {
+  (gpe_number - gpe_block-block_base_number =
(gpe_block-register_count * 8))) {


Thanks. I'll apply it.


BTW. I noticed that some definition for structure is added and
its naming collide to our OS-dependent module.
We has been avoided it by using non-linuxlized ACPI-CA that
has the naming rule of beggining with 'Acpi' not 'acpi_'.
Would you care about it next time?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


Re: [acpi-jp 2106] RE: ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-20 Thread Takanori Watanabe
Would you try it?

http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpi-20030321.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~takawata/acpica-freebsd-20030321.tar.gz

The OSD interface of
void
AcpiOsDerivePciId(ACPI_HANDLE Rhandle, ACPI_HANDLE Lhandle,
ACPI_PCI_ID **Id)

is not impremented yet. (Only Do-Nothing function)
If this is impremented, PCI-PCI bridge handling on ACPI-CA
is will be better.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


ACPI-CA import/new diff?

2003-03-19 Thread Nate Lawson
It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are
a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current.  Could
someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
testing?  If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
nice to have an import before 5.1R

http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/CHANGES.txt

Thanks,
Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message