On Thursday, May 24, 2012 2:15:26 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
Now that you committed the acpi_cpu fix I'd like to do the easy part -
protection from the problem in the future.
Does the following look OK?
Index: sys/kern/subr_bus.c
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:33:56 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
bus_hint_device_unit()
(and/or, not make the unit number in
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:18:25 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Not sure what you disagree with...
First, the wildcard
on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
bus_hint_device_unit()
(and/or, not make the unit number in cpuX mean anything at all, but use a
separate
ivar to track
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:33:56 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
bus_hint_device_unit()
(and/or, not make the unit number in
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 15/05/2012 17:34 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent
on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Not sure what you disagree with...
First, the wildcard device is added to the child list during the walk.
Then, the unit 0 device is added to the list when acpi_timer identify is
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:18:25 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Not sure what you disagree with...
First, the wildcard device is added to the child list during the walk.
Then, the unit
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have
a
suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.
on 15/05/2012 17:34 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have
a
suspicion
on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have a
suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.
acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
acpi0:
I've just updated to -current and noticed the following errors in dmesg:
acpi0: NEC on motherboard
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 10, bbf0 (3) failed
driver bug: Unable to set
on 13/05/2012 11:39 Bruce Cran said the following:
I've just updated to -current and noticed the following errors in dmesg:
acpi0: NEC on motherboard
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I
have a suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.
acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of
14 matches
Mail list logo
