Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021122 (was Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!)

2002-12-09 Thread Sid Carter
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:38:13 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Mitsuru> The patches against today's CURRENT at: Mitsuru> http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-test20021128.diff Mitsuru> Please try this if you have problems about

Re: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021122 (was Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!)

2002-11-27 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-27 ] [ Subjecte: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021122 (was Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!) ] > The patches against today's CURRENT at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-

Re: [acpi-jp 2000] RE: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-27 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, > Our web person is out today, so things will be posted Monday at the > earliest. > > I'll email Iwasaki-san the latest release, so y'all can get going if you > want. Thank you! I've just confirmed that the deleted object problem had been solved in the latest release (Andy sent it to me). I'

RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-27 Thread Grover, Andrew
; To: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; Grover, Andrew; Moore, Robert > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed! > > > > The deleted object problem has been fixed in the 20021122 > release which

RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-27 Thread Moore, Robert
] Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed! Hi, Intel folks. It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization. This causes strange behavior; first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE. > acpi_cmbat0: er

Re: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-27 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, Intel folks. It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization. This causes strange behavior; first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE. > acpi_cmbat0: error fetching current battery status -- AE_TYPE The raw DSDT is at:

Re: [acpi-jp 1940] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!

2002-11-26 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: ACPI errors and then panic > > > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) > > > Message-ID: <

Re: [acpi-jp 1940] Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-11-21 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: ACPI errors and then panic > > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > My laptop app

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-11-15 Thread Nate Lawson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: ACPI errors and then panic > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of cours

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-10-25 Thread Nate Lawson
Thank you for the reply. On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > Hi, > # ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem. Ok, I didn't know that. > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-10-04 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, # ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem. From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ACPI errors and then panic Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My laptop

ACPI errors and then panic

2002-10-04 Thread Nate Lawson
My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get suspend, resume, etc. I have never been able to get ACPI to work with it, including with a -current as of 2 hours ago. If ACPI is enabled, I get a spew of: ACPI-0412 *** Error: NsSearchAndEnter: Bad character in ACPI name and