Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:35:06 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > > > 25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Alex V. Petrov
25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry пишет: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Steven Hartland
On 24/05/2016 21:56, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: > > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are > > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset, > > which triggers a probe...and so

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset, > which triggers a probe...and so on. > > So here is another patch that should work for you: > >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:46:33 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Alex V. Petrov
24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry пишет: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > On Tue, May 24,

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300,

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Ken Merry
As Oleg mentioned, that was due to the compatibility shims for the old ATA layer getting removed. The only thing required to get those machines to boot would be to change /dev/ad* in /boot/loader.conf to the correct /dev/ada device. Ken — Ken Merry k...@freebsd.org > On May 24, 2016, at

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 06:42:18 you wrote: > Not sure, but maybe related. > I had 5 old ata systems running, doing ntp and dns cache (running since 5.0 > lifted over time to 10.x) The systems showed no smart or any other defects. > Last year they began stop working with strange messages like adaX

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >

Re: Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Olli Hauer
___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Monday 23 May 2016 17:11:34 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D.

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:05:49 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Monday 23 May 2016 16:53:55 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 23:21:32 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old > > > desktop > > > > > > after

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Monday 23 May 2016 15:25:39 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old > > desktop > > > > after update to r300299 > > Verbose boot shows the endless cycle of > > > > ata2:

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:30:35 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old desktop > after update to r300299 > Verbose boot shows the endless cycle of > > ata2: SATA reset: ports status=0x05 > ata2: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50

ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-21 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
I have faced the issue with fresh CURRENT stopped to boot on my old desktop after update to r300299 Verbose boot shows the endless cycle of ata2: SATA reset: ports status=0x05 ata2: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=50 ata2: stat0=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata2: stat1=0x50 err=0x01