Re: Adding realloc()

* Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020311 22:00] wrote: Hi, I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to do something about it. Does anyone have problems with the attached patch? This patch adds realloc()

Re: Adding realloc()

Alfred Perlstein writes: I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to do something about it. Where is the update to malloc(9)? What about reallocf? Good points, thanks.. try this one instead. -Archie

Re: Adding realloc()

* Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020312 14:45] wrote: Alfred Perlstein writes: I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to do something about it. Where is the update to malloc(9)? What about

Re: Adding realloc()

Alfred Perlstein writes: I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to do something about it. Where is the update to malloc(9)? What about reallocf? Good points, thanks.. try this one

Adding realloc()

Hi, I've had the need for a realloc() in the kernel several times before and am having it once again. Finally figured it's time to do something about it. Does anyone have problems with the attached patch? This patch adds realloc() and also fixes the semantics of free() to be consistent with