On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:04:52PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Thanks; I guess that means that for now I keep the production build machine
: is 4.8-STABLE, and I keep 5.x as a play environment until people
Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc, or am I
consigned to dual-booting?
I know the libraries are there for runtime, but can you build executables
for them?
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Karl Denninger wrote:
Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc, or am I
consigned to dual-booting?
You mean building apps linked against 4.X libs vs. 5.X? With some creative
-L flags you might be able to get it to not use /usr/lib/libc* and use
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Karl Denninger wrote:
Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc, or am I
consigned to dual-booting?
You mean building apps linked against 4.X libs vs. 5.X? With some creative
-L flags
In the last episode (Jun 14), Karl Denninger said:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Doug White wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Karl Denninger wrote:
Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc,
or am I consigned to dual-booting?
You mean building apps
Thanks; I guess that means that for now I keep the production build machine
is 4.8-STABLE, and I keep 5.x as a play environment until people move
over.
The fun will begin when migration begins in significant numbers, but I still
need to support both!
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Thanks; I guess that means that for now I keep the production build machine
: is 4.8-STABLE, and I keep 5.x as a play environment until people move
: over.
I think, but am not positive, that 4.8-stable boxes can
