On Wednesday 05 January 2011 14:14:39 Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's
> VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved,
> semi-weekly analyzer runs at
>
> http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/
I c
On Sun, 09.01.2011 at 01:13:54 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > > > *But*, it should grok that
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > > *But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some
> > > possible remedies:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>
> Den 06/01/2011 kl. 20.56 skrev Tijl Coosemans:
>
> > On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> >> Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Sp?rl
Den 06/01/2011 kl. 20.56 skrev Tijl Coosemans:
> On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
>>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
- get IPA to work with clang, or at least file a bug
- ma
On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler shou
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should "know" that these do
>>> not return.
>
>> And clang did the
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should "know" that these
> > > do
> > > not return.
>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:22:42PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>
> Den 05/01/2011 kl. 17.55 skrev Ulrich Sp?rlein:
>
> > And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
> > inter-procedural analysis yet, so it will usually miss that usage()
> > calls exit unconditionally
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 17.55 skrev Ulrich Spörlein:
> And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
> inter-procedural analysis yet, so it will usually miss that usage()
> calls exit unconditionally.
>
> *But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some
>
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should "know" that these do
> > not return.
> And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
> i
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote:
> On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> > >
> > > Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
> > >
> > > > Ignoring contrib code for
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> >
> > Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
> >
> > > Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw
> > > from 2011-01-05. There's on
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>
> Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
>
> > Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw
> > from 2011-01-05. There's one report
> > (http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/usr.sbin.pw/2
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.14 skrev Ulrich Spörlein:
> Hello folks,
>
> Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's
> VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved,
> semi-weekly analyzer runs at
>
>http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
> Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw from
> 2011-01-05. There's one report
> (http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/usr.sbin.pw/2011-01-05-amd64/report-KkilQ3.html#EndPath)
> which turns out to be a false
Hello folks,
Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's
VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved,
semi-weekly analyzer runs at
http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/
If you are an HTML/CSS expert and want to help "style" that
17 matches
Mail list logo
