On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:16:00PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:55:24PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Please rebuild the world with the patch and check that gettimeofday(2) still
> > works on your architecture, both for the static and dynamic binaries.
> > I thin
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:55:24PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9
> > > use the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9
> > use the syscall for gettimeofday(2) and clock_gettime(2). Apparently, this
> > is du
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9
> use the syscall for gettimeofday(2) and clock_gettime(2). Apparently, this
> is due to my use of the weak reference to the __vdso* symbols in the
> libc
Bruce Evans reported that statically linked binaries on HEAD an stable/9
use the syscall for gettimeofday(2) and clock_gettime(2). Apparently, this
is due to my use of the weak reference to the __vdso* symbols in the
libc implementations.
Patch below reworks the __vdso* attributes to only make the
