>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
>> Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get
>> the
>> 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
>> GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
>> SMP/APIC.
>> I want to use the same kernel making as small a
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
>
> > Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
> > 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
> > GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associa
Hi,
Does FreeBSD-SMP have anything equivalent to the processor_bind(2) call
on Solaris, which binds a process to a specific processor?
http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/816-0212/6m6nd4nci?a=view
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
> Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get the
> 'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
> GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with SMP/APIC.
> I want to use the same kernel making as small a change as
> ness
> * De: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data:
> 2003-01-28 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
>> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]:
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus
* De: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > &
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:53:49PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > that the overhead assoicated with SMP will skew the statistics.
> > > So my question is what would be the 'best' way to make an SMP
> > > kernel only start/use CPU0?
> >
> > Yank the others ?
> >
>
> What about building
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030128 12:50]: wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
> > be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
> > realize running GENERIC would on
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
> be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
> realize running GENERIC would only use 1 CPU but the concern is
> that the overhead assoicated with S
Hi,
I'm doing some performance analysis on FreeBSD. I would like to
be able to make an SMP kernel use only one CPU. Of course I
realize running GENERIC would only use 1 CPU but the concern is
that the overhead assoicated with SMP will skew the statistics.
So my question is what would be the 'bes
10 matches
Mail list logo