Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-18 Thread Takehiro Suzuki
Hello,I'm Takehiro Suzuki,a FreeBSD user. :-) In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> > It is available from http://www.bsdclub.org/~takehiro/binutils.tar.gz . >> >> I am taking a look at it now. Since you did not rename any of the bits >> (such as `as', `ld', etc..) what i

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-16 Thread Takehiro Suzuki
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> As I pointed earlier I manually updating my cvs shapshot and packing it into >> binutils.tar.bz2, which obviously unpacks into work/binutils directory. Here some It seems so good.Is it in ports-current? Takehiro Suzuki [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread Maxim Sobolev
David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > For me it does work ;). Anyway you are free to hack/use it for whatever you > > like. > > Besides not building, it isn't PREFIX clean. You need to change > "HAS_CONFIGURE" to "GNU_CONFIGURE". Thanks for po

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread Maxim Sobolev
David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > This port needs a *lot* of work as it doesn't work. But I am cleaning it > > > up now. > > > > For me it does work ;). Anyway you are free to hack/use it for whatever you > > like. > > I'd *REALLY* like t

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread Daniel Robbins
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:59:06PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > I was not throwing stones. It comes down to what is is best for FreeBSD. > Since we might have two potential sources for Binutils, I want the one > that is easiest for FreeBSD to work with. Lu has said he will take > FreeBSD patche

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > This port needs a *lot* of work as it doesn't work. But I am cleaning it > > up now. > > For me it does work ;). Anyway you are free to hack/use it for whatever you > like. I'd *REALLY* like to know how it even began to build fo

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > For me it does work ;). Anyway you are free to hack/use it for whatever you > like. Besides not building, it isn't PREFIX clean. You need to change "HAS_CONFIGURE" to "GNU_CONFIGURE". To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread Maxim Sobolev
David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 04:56:52PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > I've also made port of development version of gas available at > > http://homepages.go.com/~sobomax/glx/gas-devel.tgz . > > > > It requres bzip'ed version of binutils' cvs snapshot in /usr/tmp. > > This port

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:13:13PM +0900, Takehiro Suzuki wrote: > I make ports of binutils-2.9.5.0.27. > It is available from http://www.bsdclub.org/~takehiro/binutils.tar.gz . I am taking a look at it now. Since you did not rename any of the bits (such as `as', `ld', etc..) what is the impact

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-15 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 04:56:52PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I've also made port of development version of gas available at > http://homepages.go.com/~sobomax/glx/gas-devel.tgz . > > It requres bzip'ed version of binutils' cvs snapshot in /usr/tmp. This port needs a *lot* of work as it doesn

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-14 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Takehiro Suzuki wrote: > Hello.I'm Takehiro Suzuki. > > I make ports of binutils-2.9.5.0.27. > > It is available from http://www.bsdclub.org/~takehiro/binutils.tar.gz . I've also made port of development version of gas available at http://homepages.go.com/~sobomax/glx/gas-devel.tgz . It requres

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-14 Thread Takehiro Suzuki
Hello.I'm Takehiro Suzuki. I make ports of binutils-2.9.5.0.27. It is available from http://www.bsdclub.org/~takehiro/binutils.tar.gz . Takehiro Suzuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mess

Re: FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-13 Thread H . J . Lu
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 02:35:51PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm writing you on behalf of the freebsd-current mailing list, with some > questions regarding binutils. Freebsd-current has integrated gcc 2.95.2 > into the standard sources, but is still using a relatively old vers

FreeBSD-current question re: binutils

2000-02-12 Thread Daniel Robbins
Hi there, I'm writing you on behalf of the freebsd-current mailing list, with some questions regarding binutils. Freebsd-current has integrated gcc 2.95.2 into the standard sources, but is still using a relatively old version of binutils (2.9.1 or thereabouts). Several people are wondering what