on 28/09/2011 00:59 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
>>> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
>>
>> Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an AT
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
>> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
>
> Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk.
> I am sure that you know the answer.
>
> P.S. camcont
on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following:
> Is "camcontrol readcap" supposed to work for an ATA disk?
Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk.
I am sure that you know the answer.
P.S. camcontrol, of course, can be extended to support the corresponding ATA
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
>> Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
>>
>> I found this behavior:
>> % camcontrol devlist
>>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> Surely the device ID in bus/target/LUN format should be 2:0:0 for the
> Seagate hard disk?
Ah, OK. Here is what I get now:
These are the devices, as shown in the dmesg.boot output:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0
ada0: ATA-7
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
> Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
>
> I found this behavior:
> % camcontrol devlist
> at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
> at sc
Hi,
I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
I found this behavior:
% camcontrol devlist
at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,cd0)
% camcontrol readcap 0:0:0
camcontrol: cam_open_bt
