Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter of course.

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of volunteers? I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at leas successful booting/working net/route etc), someone else probably could have to say something too. I think resources are there, they

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of volunteers? I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at leas successful booting/working net/route etc), someone

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation correctness , means Syntax is tested . I have downloaded

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter of course. Note however that this is a volunteer effort. Were you

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Fleuriot Damien
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times :) But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be easily tested with VMs. There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd wrote: On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly interested in suggestions about what *could* be done- just what somebody is doing.

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Jacob mja...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly interested in suggestions

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times :) But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be easily

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.comwrote: Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times