On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2010 19:47:00 Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote:
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie diks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery
On 27 April 2010 10:01, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote:
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie diks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering
on 27/04/2010 09:00 Jeff Roberson said the following:
I think some people are enabling after returning to single user from a
live system rather than booting into single user. This is a different
path in the filesystem as booting directly just mounts read-only while
the other option updates a
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery table.
** Resolving unreferenced inode list.
** Processing journal entries.
** 0 journal records in
on 26/04/2010 16:42 dikshie said the following:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
0/0 I guess. Floating point allows that :-)
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
# kgdb -q /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VBOOK/kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.12
...
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
246 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) x/s panicstr
0xc07c2160
On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie diks...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for SUJ.
btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean?
--
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g
** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4.
** Building recovery table.
** Resolving unreferenced
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
First, many thanks for this effort, it is really very appreciated,
Panic on Gnome starting:
Thank you for the report with stack. That was very helpful. I know how
to fix this bug but it will take me a day or two as my primary test
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling.
I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs
9-CURRENT r207195 (i386).
Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free
On Sunday 25 April 2010 19:47:00 Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
Hi Jeff,
thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling.
I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs
9-CURRENT r207195 (i386).
Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily
reproduced with these steps:
# mdconfig -s 128M -S
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs: /dev/ad0s2a: failed
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 23:15:48 Jeff Roberson wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
unclean shutdown.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not
Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
try in single user mode:
tunefs -j enable /
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
tunefs: soft
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Gary Jennejohn
gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ)
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Jeff Roberson escreveu:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Gary Jennejohn
gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -1000 (HST)
Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
unclean shutdown. SUJ may be enabled with tunefs -j enable and disabled
Jeff Roberson escreveu:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements.
If not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with
soft-updates to eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
unclean shutdown. SUJ may be enabled with tunefs
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 00:15, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
You may have seen my other Soft-updates journaling (SUJ) announcements. If
not, it is a journaling system that works cooperatively with soft-updates to
eliminate the full background filesystem check after an
27 matches
Mail list logo
