On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:18:52PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
I have imported acpica 0619. I will be gone for a few hours but will be
checking again tonight in case there are any problems.
I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't
have any runtime regressions for
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:18:52PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
I have imported acpica 0619. I will be gone for a few hours but will be
checking again tonight in case there are any problems.
I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed,
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote:
I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't
have any runtime regressions for me so far, so that's good!
Good. So far things look ok, no reports of new regression.
However, something I haven't seen reported before, is
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:21:56AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging
section in the modules/acpi/Makefile.
However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from simply
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:43:33AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
A fix has been tested and committed.
dmobject.c has not been added to sys/conf/files.*
Thanks, that has been committed.
Thanks :-)
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have imported acpica 0619. I will be gone for a few hours but will be
checking again tonight in case there are any problems. In particular, I
am no longer sure if this patch is needed. If you do have problems, give
it a try.
Thanks,
Nate
--- nsalloc.c.old Wed May 28 10:32:31 2003
+++
