You're correct in that better awareness is almost definitely the key.
Would you consider posting the -stable and -current port build results
You can find the realtime results from http://bento.freebsd.org/
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send
advocate type="devils"
On Sun, Jul 11, 1999 at 08:13:37PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
[snip]
"Q: Why shouldn't I just go ahead and run -current? That's got
all the latest stuff, right?
[snip]
If you can live with that, and think you have any compelling reason
to run -current, read
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 04:04:46PM -0400, Nicolas Blais wrote:
Hi. I've finally installed FreeBSD 4.0 and to tell you the truth, I'm
not very impressed. I was expecting some bugs but not like that...
Not the best way to start a message if you want to get responses. Also,
the wrapping
Hi. I've finally installed FreeBSD 4.0 and to tell you the truth, I'm
not very impressed. I was expecting some bugs but not like that...
I don't see a problem with FreeBSD 4.0 so much as a problem with
someone jumping beyond their abilities. :)
Please, go back to 3.2-STABLE. 4.0-CURRENT is
Also, before I removed 3.2 from my system, I made a little cpp hello
world program and with GCC the binary was 8k. That same program was
40k with EGCS. Anyone know why?
Look at the ``ldd'' output. libstdc++ is statically linked if you used
the egcs port (which if you did this on 3.2 you
