On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Glen Gross wrote:
> This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
> while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
> and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
> has hooks into al
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 02:57:55 -0700
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kris> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
kris> I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the ne
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
Kris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responds:
> I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
> code.
What about makeing the individual encription and authentication
schemes loadable mo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 02:57:55 -0700
: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
:
: kris> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: >
: > Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:54:00AM -0600, Brad Huntting wrote:
>
> Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
>
> Kris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responds:
> > I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
> > code.
>
> Wh
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:14:51AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 21:44:27 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > I'd love to do that, but it would have to be removed for the install
> > disks. The kernel already is too fat for them :-(
>
> Have we come to a decision on when we'
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:40:24 CST, Brad Huntting wrote:
> > Have we come to a decision on when we're going to either drop floppy
> > support or consider a different version of GENERIC for the CDROM
> > installation?
>
> Along the lines of droping floppy support: I just managed to setup
> a DHC
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:25:56AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > Is there any chance to enable IPSEC in GENERIC?
>
> I'm not sure how much that would bloat the kernel..there may not be
> space for it on the install floppy.
I might misunderstand how
This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
has hooks into all the networking code, does this
become an issue on slow or otherwis
> Have we come to a decision on when we're going to either drop floppy
> support or consider a different version of GENERIC for the CDROM
> installation?
Along the lines of droping floppy support: I just managed to setup
a DHCP/TFTP/NFS diskless boot server that boots the floppy install
images.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
code.
Kris
PGP signature
Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
brad
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
12 matches
Mail list logo
