Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On 1 December 2011 13:17, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote: >> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 >> > Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> > >> >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source >> >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying >> >> >>> what to csup >> >> >>> >> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just >> >> >>> >> >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile >> >> >>> >> >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config >> >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two >> >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to >> >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older >> >> >>> version sources. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make >> >> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I >> >> >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> >> >> >> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. >> >> >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. >> >> > >> >> > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm >> >> > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points >> >> > to HEAD. >> >> >> >> Yep, sure. >> >> I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. >> >> >> > >> > It works for me now as expected, thanks. >> > >> > Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile >> > and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, >> > they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, >> > 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? >> >> In STABLE branches standard-supfile and stable-supfile are used to have >> the same cvs tag. FYI, compare how it is done in RELEASE branches. >> >> > And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see >> > tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I >> > use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. >> >> To my knowledge, in CURRENT a standard-supfile's cvs tag should be >> read as "the latest (i.e. the most recently created) stable branch". > Could the supfiles be generated from some value in newvers.sh ? I have no idea how it could be done gracefully, sorry. But I like how it is done in www/. Here are several defined entities used elsewhere in doc&www. and so on. -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 > > Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > > >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov > >> > wrote: > >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> Hi, > >> >>> > >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source > >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying > >> >>> what to csup > >> >>> > >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > >> >>> > >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just > >> >>> > >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile > >> >>> > >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config > >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two > >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to > >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older > >> >>> version sources. > >> >>> > >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make > >> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... > >> >>> > >> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I > >> >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... > >> >>> > >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > >> >> > >> >> Hi. > >> >> > >> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. > >> >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. > >> > > >> > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm > >> > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points > >> > to HEAD. > >> > >> Yep, sure. > >> I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. > >> > > > > It works for me now as expected, thanks. > > > > Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile > > and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, > > they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, > > 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? > > In STABLE branches standard-supfile and stable-supfile are used to have > the same cvs tag. FYI, compare how it is done in RELEASE branches. > > > And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see > > tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I > > use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. > > To my knowledge, in CURRENT a standard-supfile's cvs tag should be > read as "the latest (i.e. the most recently created) stable branch". Could the supfiles be generated from some value in newvers.sh ? pgpWdpj5GwCx0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 > Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov >> > wrote: >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying >> >>> what to csup >> >>> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 >> >>> >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just >> >>> >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile >> >>> >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older >> >>> version sources. >> >>> >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make >> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... >> >>> >> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I >> >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... >> >>> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 >> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> >> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. >> >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. >> > >> > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm >> > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points >> > to HEAD. >> >> Yep, sure. >> I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. >> > > It works for me now as expected, thanks. > > Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile > and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, > they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, > 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? In STABLE branches standard-supfile and stable-supfile are used to have the same cvs tag. FYI, compare how it is done in RELEASE branches. > And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see > tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I > use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. To my knowledge, in CURRENT a standard-supfile's cvs tag should be read as "the latest (i.e. the most recently created) stable branch". -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300 Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov > > wrote: > >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source > >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying > >>> what to csup > >>> > >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > >>> > >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just > >>> > >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile > >>> > >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config > >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two > >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to > >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older > >>> version sources. > >>> > >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make > >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version... > >>> > >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I > >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag... > >>> > >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > >> > >> Hi. > >> > >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. > >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. > > > > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm > > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points > > to HEAD. > > Yep, sure. > I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. > It works for me now as expected, thanks. Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources, they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE, 8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently? And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either. Regards, Milan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated >> via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup >> >> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 >> >> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just >> >> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile >> >> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config file, >> however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two weeks old) >> this file points to version 8 files, so I need to correct it for >> 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older version sources. >> >> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make installworld >> install example files pointing to older version... >> >> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I think this >> line should already be changed to new tag... >> >> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > > Hi. > > Fixed. Thanks for your report. > Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points to HEAD. - Max ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated >>> via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup >>> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 >>> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just >>> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile >>> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config file, >>> however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two weeks old) >>> this file points to version 8 files, so I need to correct it for >>> 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older version sources. >>> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make installworld >>> install example files pointing to older version... >>> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I think this >>> line should already be changed to new tag... >>> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 >> >> Hi. >> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report. >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. > > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points to > HEAD. Yep, sure. I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team. -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch wrote: > Hi, > > I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated > via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just > > csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile > > to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config file, > however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two weeks old) > this file points to version 8 files, so I need to correct it for > 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older version sources. > > The same is also true after upgrade from source - make installworld > install example files pointing to older version... > > Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I think this > line should already be changed to new tag... > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 Hi. Fixed. Thanks for your report. Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources. -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?
Hi, I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying what to csup *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older version sources. The same is also true after upgrade from source - make installworld install example files pointing to older version... Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I think this line should already be changed to new tag... *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 Regards, Milan ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
