David Scheidt wrote:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
They try to map graphs into a line.
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
who is as social as a wampas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dav
id Scheidt writes:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
runlevels are a very oldfashioned way to think about things, I
David Scheidt wrote:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
Well, the one danger is that we'd be slowly drifting away from
the classic BSD way of doing thigs. Of course, the official BSD
is dead (right?). But
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 01:22:46AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
runlevels, OpenBSD does not or goes with an entirely different
system), them would it be fair to consider FreeBSD "BSD"? The
advantage here is that FreeBSD would mature into it's own type of
UNIX with a BSD heritage.
Can we
