Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mp3blaster-3.1.3
I have a patch, will talk to maintainer.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
If FreeBSD wants to take the simple approach and only support
one thread library in ports (-pthread == -lpthread) and not
make it selectable via PTHREAD_LIBS, then its not a problem.
It would be nice to be able to support all our
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
It would be nice to be able to support all our thread
libraries, but I grow weary.
I grow weary yesterday.
You've just been around a little longer than I have!
--
Dan Eischen
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:01:35AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
- fix all ports to respect PTHREAD_LIBS _ON THE LINKING STAGE_ (so no
global search replace, for it shouldn't be used in compile command lines)
- keep '-pthread' as a compiler option, which maps to a NOOP for compiling
and
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
If FreeBSD wants to take the simple approach and only support
one thread library in ports (-pthread == -lpthread) and not
make it selectable via PTHREAD_LIBS, then its not a problem.
It
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:11:53AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Stijn Hoop wrote:
Just an idea (I hope this hasn't been said before in the mega thread but at
least I didn't get it this way):
- fix all ports to respect PTHREAD_LIBS _ON THE LINKING STAGE_ (so no
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
[skipped]
omniORB-4.0.2
PR/56862 is waiting for ports unfreezing.
--
Sem.
___
[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
pwlib-1.5.0_2
I have sent patches for pwlib and gnomemeeting to the maintainer
shortly after the gnome2.4 import, and he said they would be commited
(with a slight modification) when the ports freeze was lifted.
--
Morten Rodal
* Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030924 01:50]:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this
gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of
determining wether to use threading,
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
icecast-1.3.12_1
I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test with. I don't mind the port marked
BROKEN, since it's unsupported abandonware and due for deorbit anyway.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
icecast-1.3.12_1
I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test with. I don't mind the port marked
BROKEN, since it's unsupported
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 19:36, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 04:18, Kris Kennaway wrote:
icecast-1.3.12_1
I don't have a -CURRENT machine to test with. I
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the -pthread is deprecated error message). None of
these were fixed by ports/57047. It is likely that there are many
more that also need to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the -pthread is deprecated error message). None of
these were fixed by
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:32:05PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
will still be different?
Not if -pthread remains. Internally gcc would link to a different
library, but most
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:43:54PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
will still be different?
Not if -pthread
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:33:43PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Won't these ports still need to be fixed to look at
PTHREAD_{LIBS,CFLAGS} though, since the correct values for 4.x and 5.x
will still be different?
Not if -pthread remains. Internally
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030923 22:21]:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the -pthread is deprecated error message). None of
One very important group of ports
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:34:13AM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
One very important group of ports that should get looked at when this
gets worked out is KDE. Apparently, Qt uses a different means of
determining wether to use threading, than the ports that depend on it.
The qt-using ports
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030923 22:21]:
Here is a partial list of the ports that need to be taught to respect
PTHREAD_LIBS and PTHREAD_CFLAGS, from the latest 5.x package build (I
just grepped for the -pthread is deprecated error
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:49:50AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
It would be nice to be able to support all our thread
libraries, but I grow weary.
I grow weary yesterday.
--
John Birrell
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
22 matches
Mail list logo
