Intel I440GX+
Hi, I have a test server here that runs -CURRENT, just cvs'd to the latest and greatest. Well, it doesn't seem to like my ACPI is my guess. Once it display's the motherboard's ACPI it panic's and reboots. I'll have to of course go back to an old kernel since I stupidly tookout the debugger. This isn't my normal email address also so if you could send reply's to this email address. I was wondering most of all if anyone else with an Intel I440GX+ P2-450 roughly was experiencing problems? Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. Quite rare. Thanks -- Scott Likens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel I440GX+
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote: ... Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow. Quite rare. Thanks -- Scott Likens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel I440GX+
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote: ... Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow. No, Dual P2 Xeons. Thanks but no thanks. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel I440GX+
Scott Likens wrote: On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote: ... Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow. No, Dual P2 Xeons. Hmmm ? Are you sure ? I own an L440GX+ and Xeon's do not fit on it. You might have either an MS440GX or a C440GX, the former being a workstation board (with AGP), the later an entry level server board if there are PII Xeon CPU's on it. Regards Roberto ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel I440GX+
Roberto de Iriarte wrote: Scott Likens wrote: On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote: ... Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow. No, Dual P2 Xeons. Hmmm ? Are you sure ? I own an L440GX+ and Xeon's do not fit on it. You might have either an MS440GX or a C440GX, the former being a workstation board (with AGP), the later an entry level server board if there are PII Xeon CPU's on it. Only first PIIs had L2 cache which was unable to store data located beyond 512Mb memory boundary (233-300MHz, Klamath), and some of them even didn't support ECC for L2 cache. All the next PIIs (333-450MHz, Deschutes) had L2 cache with ECC, capable of all 4Gb. So PIIs are not so bad as some people may think. Besides, L2 cache of PIIXeons and some PIIIXeons (Drake Tanner) is slow because it is off-core, regardless of running at full core speed. --- Regards, Rhett Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel I440GX+
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 21:09, RMH wrote: Roberto de Iriarte wrote: Scott Likens wrote: On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 03:27, Tom wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Scott Likens wrote: ... Onboard SCSI, 1gig of ECC, dual P2-450's. Never had this problem before. I hope you are using P3s, or Xeon CPUs not P2s, since P2s are not able to cache memory above 512MB, which means that things will be real slow. No, Dual P2 Xeons. Hmmm ? Are you sure ? I own an L440GX+ and Xeon's do not fit on it. You might have either an MS440GX or a C440GX, the former being a workstation board (with AGP), the later an entry level server board if there are PII Xeon CPU's on it. Only first PIIs had L2 cache which was unable to store data located beyond 512Mb memory boundary (233-300MHz, Klamath), and some of them even didn't support ECC for L2 cache. All the next PIIs (333-450MHz, Deschutes) had L2 cache with ECC, capable of all 4Gb. So PIIs are not so bad as some people may think. Besides, L2 cache of PIIXeons and some PIIIXeons (Drake Tanner) is slow because it is off-core, regardless of running at full core speed. --- Regards, Rhett Also to note, that now the computer boots again with the madt.c 1.4.4 Thanks. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
