On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:49:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
J> Let's not make ipfilter some random one-off vendor source that imports code
J> into random places. The remaining instances of that that we have (such as
J> stdtime) are a PITA to deal with.
J>
J> vendor/ipfilter == userland bits =>
On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:21:36 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> > The BSD license allows us to put the code into FreeBSD w/o any
separation.
> C> >
> C> > So the question is: what is more handy to us?
> C> >
> C> > What do we actually
On Friday, July 05, 2013 4:46:49 am Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Cy,
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 03:10:14PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> Unfortunately it doesn't work any more. Here is what svn spit out at me.
> C>
> C> slippy$ cd $MY_WORK_DIR/current/contrib/ipfilter
> C> slippy$ svn merge --recor
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
...
> No, userland tools should be placed in bin|sbin|usr.bin|usr.sbin,
> according to the place where they are installed. An exlusion can be made
> adding a intermediate subdir (like this is already done for ipfilter
> tools),
> to group all r
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I think the main distinction here is whether the adaptions to
> FreeBSD are kept local (resulting in almost a fork) or are fed
> upstream so that successive updates require less or no local
> changes.
>
> Having the kernel part in sys/netp
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
C> > The BSD license allows us to put the code into FreeBSD w/o any separation.
C> >
C> > So the question is: what is more handy to us?
C> >
C> > What do we actually gain having contrib/ipf, assuming we got vendor branch
C> > already?
C
In message <20130708134400.gh67...@glebius.int.ru>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> Cy,
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:38:21AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> > What I'd prefer to see is the following:
> C> >
> C> > - commit new ipfilter untouched to vendor-sys/ipfilter
> C> > - nuke sys/contrib/ipfilte
In message <51da85cf.3000...@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes:
> On 05.07.2013 20:38, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message <20130705084649.gc67...@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> >> What I'd prefer to see is the following:
> >>
> >> - commit new ipfilter untouched to vendor-sys/ipfilter
> >>
Cy,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:38:21AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
C> > What I'd prefer to see is the following:
C> >
C> > - commit new ipfilter untouched to vendor-sys/ipfilter
C> > - nuke sys/contrib/ipfilter
C> > - svn copy vendor-sys/ipfilter to sys/netpfil/ipfilter
C>
C> Having ipfilter in
On 05.07.2013 20:38, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message <20130705084649.gc67...@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
What I'd prefer to see is the following:
- commit new ipfilter untouched to vendor-sys/ipfilter
- nuke sys/contrib/ipfilter
- svn copy vendor-sys/ipfilter to sys/netpfil/ipfilter
Hav
In message <20130705084649.gc67...@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
> Cy,
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 03:10:14PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> C> Unfortunately it doesn't work any more. Here is what svn spit out at me.
> C>
> C> slippy$ cd $MY_WORK_DIR/current/contrib/ipfilter
> C> slippy$ svn
Cy,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 03:10:14PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
C> Unfortunately it doesn't work any more. Here is what svn spit out at me.
C>
C> slippy$ cd $MY_WORK_DIR/current/contrib/ipfilter
C> slippy$ svn merge --record-only file:///tank/wrepos/wsvn/base/vendor/ipfilte
C> r/dist@252548
C>
Hi,
Originally this email was a here is how I'm planning on doing it kind of
email but now that svn 1.8 broke the third step I need some help.
I've been getting the flattening of the ipfilter vendor branch right and
working on the importation of ipfilter 5.1.2 into my own test SVN repo.
(Now t
13 matches
Mail list logo
