Hi HPS,
Do you have better idea?
From: Kohji Okuno okuno.ko...@jp.panasonic.com
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:53:29 +0900 (JST)
Hi HPS,
On Monday 23 January 2012 09:12:46 Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
I think that UPS_PORT_POWER and UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE overlap.
And, in xhci.c you set
On Saturday 28 January 2012 12:53:39 Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
Do you have better idea?
It might be we should implement a separate control request to get the
information we need? Though that needs to be standardized. What do you think
about that?
--HPS
Hi HPS,
I think that UPS_PORT_POWER and UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE overlap.
And, in xhci.c you set UPS_PORT_POWER as folows.
When UPS_PORT_POWER is set, UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE_GET() macro will
return incorrect value.
if (v XHCI_PS_PP) {
/*
On Monday 23 January 2012 09:12:46 Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
I think that UPS_PORT_POWER and UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE overlap.
And, in xhci.c you set UPS_PORT_POWER as folows.
When UPS_PORT_POWER is set, UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE_GET() macro will
return incorrect value.
if (v
Hi HPS,
On Monday 23 January 2012 09:12:46 Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
I think that UPS_PORT_POWER and UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE overlap.
And, in xhci.c you set UPS_PORT_POWER as folows.
When UPS_PORT_POWER is set, UPS_PORT_LINK_STATE_GET() macro will
return incorrect value.